directive0@lemmy.world to Star Trek@startrek.websiteEnglish · 3 months agoAugust 30th 2024. America adopts the metric system. Never forget.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square148fedilinkarrow-up1397arrow-down113
arrow-up1384arrow-down1imageAugust 30th 2024. America adopts the metric system. Never forget.lemmy.worlddirective0@lemmy.world to Star Trek@startrek.websiteEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square148fedilink
minus-squaredafo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up33arrow-down1·3 months agoNo, switch to ISO8601
minus-squareKellysNokia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·3 months agoBonus benefit - files starting with ISO dates sort alphabetically 🧠
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agothat’s already how i save versions of my files. dd-mm-yy doesn’t make sense with files.
minus-squarefilcuk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·3 months agoOverly strict for anything day to day, overly permissive for anything important. RFC 3339 is where it’s at.
minus-squareGrimpen@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·3 months agoTIL. For purposes of this post though, RFC 3339 and ISO8601 are identical. Dates in the format YYYY-MM-DD, so 2024-08-29 is both RFC3339 and ISO8601 compliant. Not an expert, just spent around 2 minutes looking at https://ijmacd.github.io/rfc3339-iso8601/
No, switch to ISO8601
Bonus benefit - files starting with ISO dates sort alphabetically 🧠
that’s already how i save versions of my files. dd-mm-yy doesn’t make sense with files.
Overly strict for anything day to day, overly permissive for anything important.
RFC 3339 is where it’s at.
TIL.
For purposes of this post though, RFC 3339 and ISO8601 are identical. Dates in the format YYYY-MM-DD, so 2024-08-29 is both RFC3339 and ISO8601 compliant.
Not an expert, just spent around 2 minutes looking at https://ijmacd.github.io/rfc3339-iso8601/
Where