How much would you pay for a PC with 128KB RAM, and no hard disk?

In today’s money (inflation adjusted)

This an ad from Personal Computer World (UK) from 1985

    • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apple was a very different company back then. If they had followed the philosophy they have today, Apple would have been the last company to to introduce a mouse. The idea is that if a new feature becoms industry standard, they won’t apply it until like 5 years later, but make it somehow better than anyone else.

      In this context, it would have probably meant not including a keyboard or display at this point. They could have skipped the black+green stage and go straight for color displays while increasing the resolution, size and refresh rate or something.

      • Square Singer@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Waiting 5 years wasn’t really an option back in those days. PCs moved so fast that if you waited 5 years you’d be missing whole use cases.

        Now if you wait 5 years, there’s hardly a difference.

    • Oisteink@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not very surprising considering their inspiration from xerox parc. I bought a mouse in 86 for my dads pc - a 3 button Genius. On PC mouse would not take off until windows was launched - gui was not needed for real business use according to IBM

      • anlumo@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That mouse was so uncomfortable. It was built like a box, probably designed for a robot hand.

  • Brownian Motion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So everything is about right. Today you can buy a budget pc, and skim on performance, but back then (and I was there man!) you could not.

    In 1985 HDD were only starting to gain traction for PC’s and that was about the only thing you could spec up. That IBM pc is “High Res” which probably means it was VGA multicolour (yay!lol) with 640x480 resolution. So you were basically buying top of the line.

    Today, if you were to build a top of the line PC, RTX4090, latest best intel cpu, PSU, etc, etc it would be easy to spend $5K!

    But damn, the difference in performance from back then to now!! (That IBM is an XT which means it was a 4.77Mhz with 8086 cpu. Just looking at that picture, I can feel the weight of the bloody thing)

    • Square Singer@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, these PCs back then were heavy (=>much more resource intensive), handbuilt and low-volume. All things that add a lot to the price.