Seriously, what the fuck is this?

  • over_clox@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    The quality of my prescription is just fine, even if it is outdated. The quality of the lenses and frames is what’s messed up. The lenses are scratched to hell and back, and the frames snapped in two over a year ago and are rigged back up with a hairpin.

    And of course, Walmart is shutting down all of their health centers…

    I’d be ecstatic if I could just get my last prescription remade by a different company in different frames. It’s not like the lenses are out of focus, they’re just extremely scratched up.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      Ok, back to my point and not whatever you understood, it’s about the quality of the glasses, not the prescription. Hell, your prescription is clear, both your eyes aren’t the same, try to find dollar tree glasses with different prescriptions in each eyes, good luck.

      • over_clox@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        22 days ago

        Dollar Tree is not an option for me. They legally cannot sell negative prescriptions for myopia (nearsightedness). They only sell positive prescriptions for farsightedness.

        Go ahead, go check. You won’t find a negative lens anywhere off of a cheap rack.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          That’s what I keep telling you, there’s a reason for that, your asked why, I explained why.

          • over_clox@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            22 days ago

            No, you explained that I have a slight difference between each eye. Obviously. That’s beside the point.

            If I got generic lenses of -4.5 in both eyes, that would do me plenty well enough. Definitely better than no glasses at all.

            But they do not sell any generic negative lenses off the shelf.

            It’s like the system decided to be prejudice against nearsighted people for the corporate wallet.

              • over_clox@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                22 days ago

                You speak of quality. Where’s the quality when my $200+ lenses already have 4 scratches before I even get to the vehicle to head home?

                  • over_clox@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    22 days ago

                    I keep an old prescription lens in my wallet, and everyone told me that would end up scratched to hell and back. But nope, that emergency lens is fine, after years in my wallet. It was the newer Walmart glasses that I wear daily that couldn’t even make it to the vehicle brand new before getting 4 scratches.

                    I don’t need a new prescription, I just need new lenses that ain’t all scratched up and might actually resist scratches. And I find it extremely unfair that farsighted people can just go get generic glasses for like $10, while nearsighted people have no such option.