Mfw splitting the atom, entering space, stepping in the moon, etc. wasn’t radical or revolutionary:
Removed by mod
It still rings hollow, unless revolutions to overthrow monarchy weren’t radical or revolutionary.
Which revolutions were inaccessible to the poor?
And honestly, yeah, revolutions like the American one where a bunch of rich people used propaganda, money, and threats to secede so they and an oligarchic “democracy” of white male land owners could pay lower taxes and privatize public land weren’t as radical or revolutionary as subsequent propaganda made them out to be.
Removed by mod
This isn’t really about that, it’s about vibes.
Removed by mod
Pretty sure this is just some “I’m 14 and this is deep” shit lol
Removed by mod
Lol
Yep. The race to the Moon was just a dick measuring contest between the US and USSR. Manned space travel is a meaningless ego trip for governments. Unmanned space travel is equally useless in practical terms - learning about other planets does nothing to help the proletariat on our own - but at least wastes less money.
Global internet connection via satellite, and GPS, on the other hand, have helped the proletariat in actual practical terms. It’s a shame it took all that billionaire ego dick waving to get there.
Removed by mod
Something something environmentalism without class struggle is just gardening
*scientists figure out faster-than-light travel*
Me, an intellectual: Clearly not revolutionary because I can’t use my mass transit (heh) ticket on it
I sense sarcasm, but you are literally, unironically, correct.
If faster than light travel does not change the material conditions of the ordinary person, then it’s not radical or revolutionary - it’s just another toy for the rich and/or dick measuring tool for governments to boast about.
I think you’re using those words differently from how people usually use them. Because most would consider FTL travel a pretty radical and revolutionary breakthrough lol
There is a but of truth in that. But FTL travel may reduce costs due to formerly inefficient due to distance sources becoming plausible. Even if it is not available to the average Joe. A lot of advances in tech reduced the distance of objects e.g. ships and carts.
Yes… and what good it did everyone to reduce the distance of objects… Sometimes distance is good. Gives me time to think about why I’m really going there in the first place.
It enables shipment of fresh vegetables and foreign foodstuffs and massively reduces xenophobia because the others aren’t from a land far far away. Also it enables exploitation of the most efficient ore sources instead of those that are close.
Yeah I like driving, but manufacturers need to bring prices down who has $100k to spend on a car
China invented a few electric cars that are just as good as a Tesla for 1/3rd the price. Our benevolent plutocrats responded by putting a 100% tariff on Chinese electric cars.
i dunno i think the nuclear bomb was pretty revolutionary
