New favorite tool 😍

  • zygo_histo_morpheus@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Looking at the example

    Why does the generated bash look like that? Is this more safe somehow than a more straighforward bash if or does it just generate needlessly complicated bash?

  • ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    As a long-time bash, awk and sed scripter who knows he’ll probably get downvoted into oblivion for this my recommendation: learn PowerShell

    It’s open-source and completely cross-platform - I use it on Macs, Linux and Windows machines - and you don’t know what you’re missing until you try a fully objected-oriented scripting language and shell. No more parsing text, built-in support for scalars, arrays, hash maps/associative arrays, and more complex types like version numbers, IP addresses, synchronized dictionaries and basically anything available in .Net. Read and write csv, json and xml natively and simply. Built-in support for regular expressions throughout, web service calls, remote script execution, and parallel and asynchronous jobs and lots and lots of libraries for all kinds of things.

    Seriously, I know its popular and often-deserved to hate on Microsoft but PowerShell is a kick-ass, cross-platform, open-source, modern shell done right, even if it does have a dumb name imo. Once you start learning it you won’t want to go back to any other.

    • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I appreciate you sharing your perspective. Mine runs counter to it.
      The more PowerShell I learn, the more I dislike it.

      • ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I do. Currently I use it mostly for personal stuff as part of my time spent on production support. Importing data from queries, exporting spreadsheets, reading complex json data and extracting needed info, etc. In the past when I was on DevOps used it with Jenkins and various automation processes, and I’ve used it as a developer to create test environments and test data.

  • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Basically another shell scripting language. But unlike most other languages like Csh or Fish, it can compile back to Bash. At the moment I am bit conflicted, but the thing it can compile back to Bash is what is very interesting. I’ll keep an eye on this. But it makes the produced Bash code a bit less readable than a handwritten one, if that is the end goal.

    curl -s "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Ph0enixKM/AmberNative/master/setup/install.sh" | $(echo /bin/bash)

    I wish this nonsense of piping a shell script from the internet directly into Bash would stop. It’s a bad idea, because of security concerns. This install.sh script eval and will even run curl itself to download amber and install it from this url

    url="https://github.com/Ph0enixKM/${__0_name}/releases/download/${__2_tag}/amber_${os}_${arch}" … echo “Please make sure that root user can access /opt directory.”;

    And all of this while requiring root access.

    I am not a fan of this kind of distribution and installation. Why not provide a normal manual installation process and link to the projects releases page: https://github.com/Ph0enixKM/Amber/releases BTW its a Rust application. So one could build it with Cargo, for those who have it installed.

    • eveninghere@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I mean, you can always just download the script, investigate it yourself, and run it locally. I’d even argue it’s actually better than most installers.

      • 30p87@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Install scripts are just the Linux versions of installer exes. Hard and annoying to read, probably deviating from standard behaviour, not documenting everything, probably being bound to specific distros and standards without checks, assuming stuff way too many times.

    • jack@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      There is no sh shell. /bin/sh is just a symlink to bash or dash or zsh etc.

      But yes, the question is valid why it compiles specifically to bash and not something posix-compliant

  • yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I checked the docs, and I’m a bit confused with one thing. They show that you can capture the stdout of a command into a variabe, but they never show stderr being captured. How would that work?

    • syd@lemy.lolOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Like this: ‘’’ $mv file.txt dest.txt$ failed { echo “It seems that the file.txt does not exist” } ‘’’

      • yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Knowing if a command failed and capturing stderr (which contains stuff like error messages) are not the same thing.