David Gerard@awful.systemsM to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · edit-24 months agoCopilot AI calls journalist a child abuser, Microsoft tries to launder responsibilitypivot-to-ai.comexternal-linkmessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1193arrow-down10
arrow-up1193arrow-down1external-linkCopilot AI calls journalist a child abuser, Microsoft tries to launder responsibilitypivot-to-ai.comDavid Gerard@awful.systemsM to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · edit-24 months agomessage-square52fedilink
minus-squareShitgenstein1@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-24 months ago The details of how the software was programmed should be legally irrelevant. Why? Programmers should be legally liable for what they program.
minus-squareArchiteuthis@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 months ago Why? Programmers should be legally liable for what they program. Too many degrees of separation between a programmer and the final product and how it’s used, usually. Additionally, the decision to deploy an incomplete product or one that contains known flaws is an administrative decision, not a programming one.
Why? Programmers should be legally liable for what they program.
Too many degrees of separation between a programmer and the final product and how it’s used, usually.
Additionally, the decision to deploy an incomplete product or one that contains known flaws is an administrative decision, not a programming one.