• BilboBargains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cars produce more harmful airbourne pollutants from their brakes than they do from the tailpipe. Copper is being phased out and the ultimate goal is to abandon friction braking entirely in favour of electrical regeneration.

    • Turun@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How much from tires when braking? I was under the impression that tires (edit: cats!) produce more pm2.5 from tires than brakes, which in turn account for more than the exhaust.

      • Sigma_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I always understood tire deg to be microplastic/rubber not pm2.5. Brutal for the ecosystem around roadways and water bodies. Ultimately adding to the micro plastic pollution globally.

        • Turun@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The pm2.5 refers to the particle diameter and incorporates any particles that are less than 2.5 micrometers in size. So particulate matter and microplastics are not necessarily a contradiction

          But good that you brought it up, I did some googling and umweltdialog.de writes that microplastics from tires make up one third of Germany’s microplastics pollution! That’s an insane amount!

          It’s late here, so I won’t read it today, but the Fraunhofer Research Institute did a study called “TireWearMapping”, which promises to contain a ton of information on the creation and distribution of tire based pollutants: https://www.umsicht.fraunhofer.de/de/projekte/tyrewearmapping.html