Meldrik@lemmy.wtfM to Facepalm@lemmy.wtf · 3 months agoYou couldn't just, like, place the wheelchair at the sides??lemmy.wtfimagemessage-square72fedilinkarrow-up1934arrow-down119file-textcross-posted to: wtf@lemmy.wtf
arrow-up1915arrow-down1imageYou couldn't just, like, place the wheelchair at the sides??lemmy.wtfMeldrik@lemmy.wtfM to Facepalm@lemmy.wtf · 3 months agomessage-square72fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: wtf@lemmy.wtf
minus-squaremodus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up26·3 months agoWhat would the symbol for “no homeless” look like? A house crossed out twice?
minus-squareRozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up26arrow-down1·3 months ago What would the symbol for “no homeless” look like? ✝️
minus-squareGelatinGeorge@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 months agoThat’s the first time I’ve ever double-taked a sentence before. Nice.
minus-squarecheesymoonshadow@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 months ago🏠 inside 🚫 inside another 🚫 ?
minus-squareRememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months agoYou could probably just get away with the “no” over the home. “You have no home”, “this is not your home” simultaneously.
minus-squareflerp@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 months agoI’ve seen no camping signs with a tent crossed out and of course no loitering signs are a classic excuse to harass homeless people
What would the symbol for “no homeless” look like? A house crossed out twice?
✝️
You know, in theory
That’s the first time I’ve ever double-taked a sentence before. Nice.
🏠 inside 🚫 inside another 🚫 ?
You could probably just get away with the “no” over the home. “You have no home”, “this is not your home” simultaneously.
I’ve seen no camping signs with a tent crossed out and of course no loitering signs are a classic excuse to harass homeless people