• xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 个月前

    Elon Musk loves to speak confidently about shit he knows nothing about. This leads to him being a confident speaker on every topic… I just wish we could figure out a way to shut him up.

          • hemmes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 个月前

            Oh. This post’s image has him talking types in January and the “obligatory” image above has someone saying he’s been talking software in December, so I thought maybe Musk has been spewing about software for a few weeks or something.

            • Squibbles@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 个月前

              December from '22 not '23. The image was from a few months after he took over twitter and was still going on about that stuff and how it was doing all these useless things that needed to be removed or rewritten. I just remembered another one about how he was going on about a single request to twitter causing thousands of RPCs or something? I think that’s not really unheard of in a microservices infrastructure and it’s not like they’d be synchronous. There’s probably tons of calls that go to things like tracking, analytics, or cross DC sharing I would imagine for such a large and high volume service like twitter.

              • bleistift2@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 个月前

                needed to be removed or rewritten

                Literally any developer can tell you that. It doesn’t even matter what codebase we’re talking about. It always needs to be rewritten.

  • Skates@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 个月前

    I constantly feel the need to argue with this dumb fuck and his 99% wrong opinions. I usually have to take a step back, remember it’s not worth it, and then move on. It would be a great help if I had a Firefox add-on that precedes all of musk’s tweets with "retard weighing in: ", just as a reminder that he’s also allowed a point of view, despite his mental issues.

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 个月前

      Pretty sure you‘re only using the r-bomb and „mental issues“ in a joking way but its kind of not funny.

      Musk is a spoiled, unempathetic, overhyped idiot who claims to be autistic… perfect example that autistic people can be cretins as well.

      But a lot of autistic people are getting called the r-word and its not ok. Mental (health) issues are not a stigma. They are okay and normal. Being an asshole isnt normal or okay though.

          • Gabu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 个月前

            From the very source you provided:

            […] by Late Latin normālis had also come to mean “according to a rule”, from which modern English senses of the word derive: in the 1800s, as people began to quantitatively study things like height and weight and blood pressure, the usual or most common values came to be referred to as “normal”, and by extension values regarded as healthy or desirable came to be called “normal” regardless of their usuality.

            I don’t think anyone of sane mind would argue against the notion that it’s more desirable, and by definition healthier, to be born neurotypical than neurodivergent.

            • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 个月前

              just exchange the word neurodivergent with black or jewish and neurotypical with white or christian and you see the problem.

              Provided you are “sane”.

  • HairHeel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 个月前

    I tend to think people shit on Musk more than they should, but holy shit does it bug me when a CEO talks about engineering problems with such bravado.

    • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 个月前

      He talked about electric cars. I don’t know anything about cars, so when people said he was a genius I figured he must be a genius.

      Then he talked about rockets. I don’t know anything about rockets, so when people said he was a genius I figured he must be a genius.

      Now he talks about software. I happen to know a lot about software & Elon Musk is saying the stupidest shit I’ve ever heard anyone say, so when people say he’s a genius I figure I should stay the hell away from his cars and rockets.

      Rod Hilton about Elon Musk.

  • Thorry84@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 个月前

    Yes the compiler/interpreter can figure it out on the fly, that’s what we mean by untyped languages. And as stated both have their merits and their faults.

    Elon doesn’t know what the words mean and just chimes in with his AI future BS.

      • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 个月前

        By typed they mean declairing a type for your variables.

        In some languages, variables needs to be told what kind of data they can hold. That’s it’s type. For instance a number without decimals would be an integer type. While text might be a string type or a list of character types.

        Other languages don’t require types and sometimes don’t even support them. They will just infer the type from the data that’s in the variable.

        If you see Elon Musk please explain this to him.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 个月前

      And as stated both have their merits and their faults.

      Yes! Just because a compiler could guess the type doesn’t mean it should. Elon didn’t understand the meme at all.

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 个月前

        why would you not want it to? what circumstance, other than an integer not given an explicit type, could it guess wrong?

        • RepulsiveDog4415@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 个月前

          Well, if there is nof fixed (explicit or implicit) type it’s imposible for the compiler to optimise your code. Also imho programming with typed languages is way easier because your IDE can recognize function argumentd before you compile/run. I tried python and found it baffling how anyone can get any work done with it :D

    • janAkali@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 个月前

      Yes the compiler/interpreter can figure it out on the fly, that’s what we mean by untyped languages.

      Are there untyped languages? You probably meant ‘dynamically typed languages’.

      But even statically typed languages can figure out most types for you from the context - it’s called ‘type inference’.

      • nul@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 个月前

        Most of my code is untyped. First I type it, then I realize it’s all wrong and use backspace to untype it.