• wyrmroot@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Looks interesting. Let’s paste in a NY Times article that I couldn’t read earlier.

    12ft has been disabled for this site

    …neat

        • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s just the url, the extension is available for both chrome and firefox and they already said they are on firefox

          • hillbicks@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, I just saw chrome in the url and overlooked the Firefox part in the actual sentence :D

        • Jay@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think you’re replying to the wrong person? I’ve been using firefox since it was called netscape navigator, aside from a stint in the 00’s

          Edit: Oh do you mean the link? I’m on firefox the “chrome” in the link is just the url, it takes you to the install for both firefox and chrome. I assume the plugin was probably made for chrome first then ported to firefox.

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            They definitely just missed the “on Firefox”, but you definitely made that clear hahaha

            • Jay@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I thought so … but there’s times my brain doesn’t always parse what I read properly either lol

              • hillbicks@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Thanks for going easy on me. :p

                Yes, that was a total brain fart on my part, I just looked at the url.

  • mayo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This doesn’t work nearly as well as it did in the past. I don’t know the story behind 12ft, but they seem to be complying with any site which has requested it to not work on their articles.

  • Schwim Dandy@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s no longer a reliable solution. Most paywalls now just throw a javascript confirmation at it’s IP that breaks the ability to display the article.

    • Doug Holland@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      And worse, 12-Foot Ladder intentionally doesn’t work on many newspaper sites. Maybe they got some cease-and-desist letters, but for bypassing paper paywalls it’s often useless.

      • Firnin@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I read somewhere that they work together with some companies and disabled their service in those news sites. But whether this co-op has monetary gains for 12ft or is the result from cease and desist orders, that I don’t know

  • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hate paywalls as much as anyone, but I’ve been thinking lately… how can we expect to fund quality journalism without paying for any news? Is it viable to rely on donations alone?

    • flubo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree and still don’t have a solution. I read a lot of news and I like to read different views on the same topic, like reading a very leftish and a very conservative article. But I just cant pay all of them. :/

      My idea was to pay two different newspapers (one for daily news the other a monthly magazine) so that I pay at least some journalists and read the rest for free. And then change whom I am paying every year or two. For this I need antipaywall to still read the rest…

      Now with some friends we have subscriptions to different newspapers and share them, but usually u have a fixed amount of devices you can connect to one subscription so more than 3 newspapers is difficult already.

      I really liked this flattr idea but I think it died. It was something like you give an amount of money every month to your flattr account and then when you read articles and you liked them you press the flattr button.l at the end of the article. At the end of the month flatttr would distribute your money among all sites that you clicked the bottom with the amount corresponding to how many articles you liked… very good idea. But died(?) with paywalls.