• Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    When I see the image what came to mind was that experiment where they had an overpopulation of rats in a cage and how all of the rats turned on each other and killed each other.

    Too much human density is not good. You have to be sure to get the percentage of humans to a acre of land just right, to prevent the rats situation.

    Nature is important, but Humanity moreso.

    • rexxit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is EXACTLY the kind of point I’m trying to make. Humans keep packing more and more into the same forever-growing cities and it makes the formerly-pleasant harsh, foreign, and unwelcoming.

      There exist nice places that have balance - green spaces, slow pace of life, nice local restaurants, uncrowded trails, minimal traffic and short commutes.

      Then they become discovered, become popular, and become overcrowded in a way that ruins what made them special to begin with. But they still look small to people from the big cities, who keep moving there. Now increasingly expensive, congested, and losing their original character, the urban zealots who invaded start screeching about cars, walkability, bikeability, and transit. It was perfectly bikeable, and there was no traffic before everyone tried to pile in.

      The enemy is GROWTH, and OVERCROWDING, not single family homes and cars.

      • akulium@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Both pictures are equally overcrowded though. And just getting rid of people is not really an option.