• 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then organise the renters, let them buy the house to transform it into syndicate or cooperative housing. Social apartment construction isn’t impossible.

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          ask yourself this: if the apartment is owned by a company who is in charge of bills?

          in the case witht he syndicate, the syndicate is in charge of the bills, the bills are split up among the members, this stuff all already exists btw.

    • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe in the US. In Germany this defintly isn’t the rule. Many people own their own flats and a lot of people own 2-4 flats to rent them out as an extra income.

        • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Where did I say “everyone”?

          But it is defintly not a given that an apartment has to be the tool of a slum lord, the way they portrayed it to discredit the idea that appatments are a more sustainable way of living…

          Apartments can be owned by the people who live in it and this is quite common in many countries.

          • akulium@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If one person rents out 4 appartments, that means that at least 4 others do not own their home. It’s the same with houses of course.

            Germany is just a particularly bad example unfortunately. Low ownership is a problem because it increases wealth inequality, which is also worse in Germany than many other nations.