Hello just making a poll, which one do you prefer? personally I prefer x265 but since the rarbg falldown i’ve seen that almost all 1080p rips are in x264, what do you think about that, and do you recommend any place to find more x265 content beside those in the megathread?

  • Kissaki@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Strange, confusing asymmetry in your title.

    10 bit HEVC allows for some crazy good compression ratio. I love it. Put it into an mkv with chapters and externalized series op and ed I can remove and ignore - perfect.

    8 bit AVC mp4 for compatibility - if that’s the goal.

    For acquisition - I’ll take what I can get.

  • pacoboyd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    All my content is converted to CPU encoded x265. Size is MUCH smaller and quality better than GPU encoded x265. My preference is to get remux copies of the content and then encode it myself.

  • PeachMan@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    H265 is objectively superior in just about every way UNLESS you’re trying to play it on hardware that doesn’t support it. The only reason to use H264 is for broad compatibility.

    • IceSea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      also its not just pure “compatibility”, but I had a time when I played vids to my TV over an old laptop (from around 2015). Worked like a charm. But some x265 vids went into full-on stutter mode in scenes where a lot of stuff was happening… was more a nuisance than a dealbreaker, but still, preferred x264 versions if I could get them

      • PeachMan@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sounds like your TV isn’t fully compatible with x265. You can get around that by using a modern streaming stick that supports it.

  • Ginko@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    x265 because all of my devices support it. Once they release a Nvidia Shield TV like device that supports AV1 I’ll change once again.

    • MoriGM@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe in the future AV1 will even get faster with the better implementations. It’s a great codec just sad that the older Raspberry Pi’s just hate x265.

  • fades@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Shit, I like HEVC in theory for the compression especially but it’s copyrighted bullshit or whatever.

    I use Plex with lifetime pass on my QNAP NAS and it has to hardware transcode HEVC to a playable format because of said copyrighted bullshit.

    It doesn’t affect me that much unless I’m trying to jump around on the media as it will need to load. The other thing is that you can have Plex save transcodes but that obviously gobbles up disk space.

    tl;dr 264 = 👑

  • itsAsin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    i have always wondered the difference between the two encodings (beyond the obvious filesize). thanks!

    i am also still lamenting the shutdown of RARBG. :(

    • Kissaki@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Both allow for various degrees of parametrization between compression rate, quality, and performance. HEVC/H.265/x265 is just better at it - it allows for better compression at the same quality. Same for 10 bit. Same for AV1.

      If you want maximum compatibility to players/playback you take 8 bit AVC/H.264/x264.