• AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So you are emotional and irrational. You are not the right person to ask here and your opinion has hardly any value.

    BTW: it’s not eugenics, but euthanasia. Which is granted to every sick animal. Get your facts straight.

    • Terevos@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Euthanasia is for people who want to die. Not for murdering babies with special needs.

          • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Would you ask an alcoholic, whether alcohol is good?

            Or a Christian if Jesus is the son of God?

            Or someone with a Cat in New Zealand whether that’s a good idea?

            Emotional attachment clouds judgment.

          • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            How am I arguing illogical?

            Seriously, explain to me, how can anybody want to create a life that is objectively way at the lower end of quality of life? How can you justify shelling out thousands of euro/dollar/whatever for such a person, while others are left more or less to die?

            • Organichedgehog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Seriously, explain to me, how can anybody want to create a life that is objectively way at the lower end of quality of life? How can you justify shelling out thousands of euro/dollar/whatever for such a person, while others are left more or less to die?

              Should we abort anyone with impoverished parents? After all, they have an objectively worse quality of life than wealthy people. Tell me exactly where you draw the line between “they will live a happy life” and “they should be killed, it’s a mercy”. Tell me exactly how you define “objectively way at the lower end of quality of life”. Downs syndrome? Cancer? Asthma?

              I mean honestly you just sound like an edgy teenager - safe bet that you probably are. But you need to realize there’s a difference between cynicism and logic.

              • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Should we abort anyone with impoverished parents?

                Hm, could we may find a difference between nature and nurture? Would that be possible here? Even arguing like that is dishonest (or stupid, you decide).

                Tell me exactly how you define “objectively way at the lower end of quality of life”. Downs syndrome? Cancer? Asthma?

                Tell me exactly how you define life. Birth? Conception? Somewhere it between?

                How do you define adulthood? 14? 21? Something in between?

                This argumentation, again, is dishonest. Decisions like that Steve clear cut. There’s a mixture of scientific and cultural valuations at play. And at the end, you can make a cutoff at some point.

                BTW: it’s already perfectly normal practice to abort disabled children. There’s a reason why there are relatively few people with down syndrome in Germany, they get aborted - and that much later than regular abortions. If someone would abort a healthy fetus at this stage, it would be considered murder.