• Psychodelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Uhh… what?

        Could you pretend I don’t already know what you mean and explain what you’re trying to communicate a bit?

          • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Thanks. That makes sense

            Who would be Enron in this scenario? I’m thinking of openai or Nvidia but can’t imagine they’re at risk of much. The game seems far more rigged in favor of corpos than 20 yrs ago. Can’t imagine how they could ever fall off at this point. Or, say a company like Netflix which I’m is using tons of algorithms…

            Wait a min. Isn’t AI now used as a catch all for any and all tech laymen don’t understand? Do you specifically mean llamas are being overhyped (had to leave the autocorrect version of LLMs)?

            Sorry, if I’m slow to the anti-AI party. It’s been hard figuring out what’s sensationalism, what’s contrarianism, and what’s legit nowadays (or maybe I’m just getting dumber :D)

              • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                You’re makin great points!

                I was actually just hearing about this Karla Ortiz copyright case. Sounds like it’s going to shine a big ol spotlight on how these systems work and how exactly they copy other people’s work.

                I wonder if it could make things so prohibitively expensive it’s no longer worth investing in for most companies. At the very least, it hopefully gives artists/content creators some kind of legal protection

    • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Copying everyone’s work and dumping out shitty versions of it. Using people behind the scenes to give your software the feel of having true intelligence. It is a con job.

      • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Ah, gotcha. I totally agree in that case, but that also sounds like standard capitalism. lol. And that shit is going strong!

    • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Companies involved in delivering AI solutions are over-selling it. In the long term it will produce much less value than investors have been led to believe. A hype train, if you will.