Servais (il/le)@discuss.tchncs.de to YUROP@lemm.ee · 3 months agoSorry, Deutsch peoplediscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square155fedilinkarrow-up1908arrow-down115
arrow-up1893arrow-down1imageSorry, Deutsch peoplediscuss.tchncs.deServais (il/le)@discuss.tchncs.de to YUROP@lemm.ee · 3 months agomessage-square155fedilink
minus-squareFauxPseudo @lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·3 months agoEveryone uses the name that China used. I guess that’s the benefit and downside of only having one neighbor.
minus-squareFauxPseudo @lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months agoThis caused me to think about upside versus downside and benefit versus some word that isn’t anti-benefit, unbenefit, abenefit, ilbenefit, irbenefit, imbenefit, inbenefit, debenefit, disbenefit. There is no etymological related antonym to benefit.
Everyone uses the name that China used. I guess that’s the benefit and downside of only having one neighbor.
This caused me to think about upside versus downside and benefit versus some word that isn’t anti-benefit, unbenefit, abenefit, ilbenefit, irbenefit, imbenefit, inbenefit, debenefit, disbenefit. There is no etymological related antonym to benefit.
malefit?
I like the way you think