According to the debate, they had their reasons. But still – when one hundred and eighty six nations say one thing, and two say another, you have to wonder about the two.

    • Enkrod
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      You know these ventriloquism-routines where the puppet makes the puppeteer talk with it’s voice?

        • Gabe Bell@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          In most of The Twilight Zones I watch the puppet ends up killing the parents, taking over the kid and staring at the camera going “Who’s a good boy?”

          Which, okay, does kind of sound like the relationship between Israel and the USA but that’s beside the point

    • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      Okay, we can hate on Israel all day long for their many crimes, but let’s not entertain “Jews run the United states” jokes. They are the US puppet. A very beloved puppet but still.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        let’s not entertain “Jews run the United states”

        Large financial institutions run the United States. And those institutions have a vested interest in controlling trade through the Mediterranean Sea, specifically by way of the Suez Canal. This creates a socio-economic incentive to back a heavily armed ethno-state with strong ties to the US/UK financial system. And - after the holocaust - the Jewish diaspora just happens to be the group that fit the bill. (The large Arab community in Saudi Arabia does, too, but its okay to be racist towards Arabs so we don’t complain quite so much about that).

        So we run into a problem. Saying “AIPAC is manipulating our elections with enormous sums of cash laundered through the MIC into mass media social manipulation” is true, but quickly gets you labeled antisemitic by people who want to conflate billionaire shipping magnets with your elderly aunt from Queens. Trying to draw a line between plutocrats entangled with the MIC and random synagogues in Chattanooga or Cleveland becomes difficult when you’ve got real actual nazi fucks screaming slurs on one side of you and cynical mass-murdering shits insisting anyone anti-war is anti-Jew on the other.

        • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah, it’s a complicated tight line to walk. Hence why it should be avoided implying that Israel puppets the United states and thus falling into actual Nazi conspiracy theories.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Hence why it should be avoided implying that Israel puppets the United states

            The influence of Israeli lobbyists and their affiliates is undeniable. As is the influence of Saudi, UK, Japan, fucking Bermuda…

            Fixating on Israelis as uniquely influential is a problem. But then we have no problem with ranting about Trump being a “Russia controlled puppet”, so we clearly aren’t above a little Cold War style hysteria.

            It might behove us to ask why Benny from Philly has such disproportionate influence, rather than just writing every observation of influence off as Jew Hate.

            But that gets us into a whole conversation about domestic police lobbying, the Pentagon’s revolving door with industry, the role of the O&G lobbyists, etc. And that’s even worse than antisemitism. It’s anti-Americanism.

      • mommykink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 months ago

        No one but you mentioned the Jewish religion. Meanwhile, pro-Zionist candidates (right and left) with the backing of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee have had an almost unexplainable 100% rate of election. The US election system has been hijacked by Israeli interests.

        • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Hijacked by Israeli interests? Comrade, they are the US interests before they are Israeli. Flipping it around and pretending the Israel state owns US politics is one key word away from Nazi conspiracy when you know the actual line of motivations begins and ends with the US.

        • turmoil
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          You completely disregard the largest zionist organisation in the US, CUFI, of which most members are American Christians.

          The US support for Israel is the perfect storm composed of financial, military and religious interests of various groups in power in the US. The interest of the Israeli government and center to right wing happen to align with those. Thinking Israel is in control in any of this and doesn’t have to pander to those American interest groups is delusional and a common, sometimes antisemitically motivated, misunderstanding.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Neither one is a puppet. Each one uses the other. Israel has an outsize influence on US foreign policy, but the US also has an outsize influence on Israeli foreign policy. Israel tries to sway US elections, and US interests try to sway Israeli elections. They share many of the same enemies, which keeps them tied together even when things aren’t necessarily in their shared interests.

        In this particular case, the two probably voted “no” for different reasons.

        The US voted “no” because they wanted John Deere to be able to remotely shut down a combine harvester, or so that Monsanto can sue people for misusing seeds, things that probably be illegal if food were seen as a human right. Israel voted no because they wanted to be able to keep denying food to Palestinians.

      • Anas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Associating Judaism with the genocidal state is anti-semitic, we don’t do that here.