• nuke@sh.itjust.worksM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    “war for minor territory movement”

    This is a war for Ukraine’s survival. Ukraine doesn’t want Russian territory, they want their own land and people that were taken returned to them.

    • Aurix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      71
      ·
      3 months ago

      I mean the current situation of losses versus territorial change is quite questionable for both sides.

      • nuke@sh.itjust.worksM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        90
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s not questionable at all, though. This operation has been a resounding success. Ukraine gained hundreds of POWs that can be used to exchange for their own people, they’re digging in and holding land and resources that can later be used during negotiations, and they’ve proven not just once but twice they are capable of sudden surprise attacks that can puncture Russian lines and take huge amounts of territory in a single sweep. That last fact alone will force Russia to recalculate their placements along the front line and move more troops to reinforce perceived weak points, taking focus away from elsewhere.

        • Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          3 months ago

          Thanks for explaing it so succintly for those that read after. I’ll add that this also expands the options avaliable to Ukraine in future combat fronts, pulling Russian attention and resources, and likely securing more current information on Russian troops. Not that Aurix will try to think about it or be convinced.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          27
          ·
          3 months ago

          What if Putin just screams, “nukes nukes nukes!”? Should everyone immediately capitulate, thereby ensuring every other country in the world chases nukes for leverage?

              • Dutczar@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                ·
                3 months ago

                Hasn’t he threatened to use nukes multiple times over the war already? Ignoring the threats generally worked out.

                • Natanael@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  His problem is nukes can only be used as a last resort when your country already has started to fall, otherwise you will trigger your own country to fall quite soon after (retaliation strikes, sanctions, fallout, riots, etc)

                  So nobody will take it as a serious threat in response to anything less than a major attack on the capital or equivalent.

              • cows_are_underrated
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 months ago

                OK, but I still don’t really get what this has to do with the original comment. I think it wasn’t really the right place to put this.

          • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            3 months ago

            Using nukes is a cry for desperation by Putin, and that would look bad for him for the Russians and for the rest of the world.

          • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            3 months ago

            He tried that, and it’s suspected USA sent him a picture of a nuke with the coordinates of his secreted bunker written on it, with “you die first” below