• RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Because half the country votes for a party that explicitly says this is a good way to run things, and the other half votes for a party that says it isn’t great, but we shouldn’t really do anything meaningful about it.

    Until there is mass “you are all assholes and we demand a more representative electoral system” demonstrations, nothing will change.

    Readers may note that this applies to basically every problem in the US right now

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Make it make sense.

    The price was bullshit to begin with. The cream probably sells over the counter for about $2.50 in most other countries, so OP still ended up paying 10x the price.

    • Godort@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Its a tax scheme.

      The pharmacy claims this medication is worth $275, insurance covers $40, and then they get as much as they can out of the patient while claiming the rest as a loss they can write off on their taxes.

      US healthcare is stupid.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        It looks like the pharmacies do not get the tax write offs, if any. It’s the drug manufacturers who get to double dip by charging insurers for whatever they’re willing to cover, and then write off the rest causing tax payers to foot the bill.

        Regardless, I agree with the article that there needs to be legislation that both bans these type of “shell game” programs, and capping the price of medications. And for what it’s worth, I don’t care if that means companies don’t make as much money. They’ll still make money, and the drugs do not actually cost that much to make.

  • Modva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    It’s insane to me that healthcare looks like this in the US, I mean I live in an objectively weaker economy and my healthcare is vastly better in terms of cost, availability and has no hard ties to employment.

    That is crazy messed up. My gut feel is that it’s again down to the corporate shareholder problem, where infinite growth is demanded. It’s defies belief that this hasn’t been fixed, and really makes me think that overall we may be losing the war of greed vs humanity.

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      My gut feel is that it’s again down to the corporate shareholder problem, where infinite growth is demanded. It’s defies belief that this hasn’t been fixed, and really makes me think that overall we’re losing the war of greed vs humanity overall.

      It’s also maintained as a tool to punish labor for stepping out of line. Look at recent labor disputes in the States. The first thing that is done by the company is to shut off healthcare access.

  • rockettaco37@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    The fact that the US is the only major industrialized nation without some from of a universal healthcare system is supremely fucked up…

    • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      I legit think it’s way too late to implement universal healthcare because the entire food industry would have to change also.

        • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          A lot of the food in the US has chemicals that are banned in other countries that have universal healthcare. The food companies spend millions on research and development to make the food literally addicting. Also our portion sizes are insanely huge. When the other countries have to pay for the healthcare of their citizens, they’re going to make damn sure the food is healthier.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    We got a shitty version of Republican healthcare reform, and Republicans and moderates refuse to admit we need anything more.

    Republicans want to tear it down

    And “moderates” say asking for more is somehow worse than being a Republican.

    Shits not getting better till will finally get neoliberal.politicians out of the Dem party and back where they came from: the Republican party.

    I don’t know why people act like they don’t understand opening the “left party” up to “fiscally conservative moderates” just concentrates all the crazy in the Republican party and depresses turnout from the right.

    If you’re trying to stop facism, we’re taking the wrong path.

    If you’re trying to make sure the wealthy always win tho, yeah, this makes sense. But the fascists are going to keep winning half the time.

    When they could be winning 0% of the time if we just gave Dem voters candidates they want. Because any “moderate” voters that go R, are statistically insignificant.

    They’re just loud and insist they’re always right. Theyre Karen’s.

    And we need to go back to just ignoring them.

    • JBar2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      What in the sam hell are you trying to communicate with this word salad?

      But if you want to talk politics and healthcare, there’s one party that’s made any real effort at improvement in the last 2 decades, and it’s the Democrats. The Republicans try to gut the system at every opportunity.

      There are plenty of Democrats in Congress that would like to continue to improve healthcare, but the Dems don’t have the numbers - particularly in the House - to pass further reform.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        There are plenty of Democrats in Congress that would like to continue to improve healthcare, but the Dems don’t have the numbers - particularly in the House - to pass further reform.

        So you’re saying therenis both “plenty” but also “not enough”?

        That doesn’t make logical sense to me…

        I’m saying not everyone Dem in office really wants to fix healthcare, as evident as there seems to always be just enough against progress to stop progress.

        And that logically it’s a safe assumption there’s even more that would oppose progress if they had to, they just don’t want to publicly oppose it unless they’re forced to.

        So we basically have two choices.

        1. Be reactive and keep assuming every Dem supports the party platform until they personally pull a Joe Manchin

        2. Be proactive and make sure the people on our team our really on our team before we have to rely on them. So that when we have the House, Senate, and presidency we can accomplish stuff.

        But if you want to talk politics and healthcare, there’s one party that’s made any real effort at improvement in the last 2 decades, and it’s the Democrats.

        And they got a more conservative version of Mitt Romney’s plan passed…

        And have spent over a decade opposi g we improve it up to at least where the Republican presidential candidate was 16 years ago…

        That’s not enough dawg

        Voters want more, they deserve more. So why not give voters a candidate that agrees so that we can easily prevent fascists from getting elected?

        I don’t see any downsides to the Dem party running Dem politicians that agree with Dem voters.

        • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          I agree with all you’re saying. Obama’s Romneycare was also a huge gift to the insurance companies.