GitCode, a git-hosting website operated Chongqing Open-Source Co-Creation Technology Co Ltd and with technical support from CSDN and Huawei Cloud.

It is being reported that many users’ repository are being cloned and re-hosted on GitCode without explicit authorization.

There is also a thread on Ycombinator (archived link)

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    The vast majority of projects on GitHub is open-source and forkable, why would that need authorization?

    It’s… suspicious that China’s doing it en masse, but there’s nothing wrong in cloning or forking a repo last i heard.

    • passepartout
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      115
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s not about authorization. They want to build a knowledge base for when the Great Firewall gets some more filters. Just like russias mirror of wikipedia which is heavily edited to discredit the west.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        And under copyleft licensing, they’re allowed to do that. Both to GitHub repositories and Wikipedia.

        • passepartout
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          42
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Of course they are, it’s not like there is some kind of international jurisdiction anyway. What is bothersome is why they do it.

          • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Even if there was jurisdiction, anyone in the world is entitled to do it by the very licenses these works are released under.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Hopefully they follow the rest of the stipulations of the licenses, such as the common one about keeping the license as such and contributing the changes back.

      • 31337@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        This seems like the most plausible explanation. Only other thing I can think of is they want to develop their own CoPilot (which I’m guessing isn’t available in China due to the U.S. AI restrictions?), and they’re just using their existing infrastructure to gather training data.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        5 months ago

        Just like russias mirror of wikipedia which is heavily edited to discredit the west.

        How come I live in Russia and have never seen such?

        I know only of quite a few troll\counterculture projects, some, like Lurkmore, are already, well, dead, some, like Traditsiya, are not.

        That, of course, if you don’t mean that Russian Wikipedia in itself has problems. Which would be true.

        • passepartout
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s called Ruwiki.

          It was launched in June 24, 2023 as a fork of the Russian Wikipedia, and has been described by some media groups as “Putin-friendly” and “Kremlin-compliant”.

    • ifsocialismwasabear@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Firewalls are already being built in america’s internet with the ban of tiktok

      As an european i do not see problem with having copies of free software in places not controlled by the monopoly microsoft is morphing to.