@JakeWeddle "He's A Sociopath" is my opinion based on the Cambridge Dictionary definition of sociopath: "A person who is completely unable or unwilling to be...
And now because I know you are here to do nothing but waste my time, you will probably ask me for a timestamp, and I would normally provide it of course because I want to keep the discussion intellectually honest.
But it’s pretty clear that you don’t, and of course after ignoring my timestamp hyperlink, you will make up some vapid arguments on how it is unpossible for Mr Least to ever have done such a thing and that I’m stupid for misunderstanding federal gambling laws.
And we can go back and forth for hours, me posting evidence, you saying whatever stupid shit that comes to your mind to push the discussion far away from the original point that Mr. Least is illegally involving children in gambling.
And I am so just fuckdamn tired of intellectually dishonest people like you ‘just asking questions’.
Your abelism infuriates me. If I were younger, I’d waste an hour rhetorically browbeating you.
You could have already completely watched the video by now but still you are here whining for timestamps just like I predicted you would. The more shitstain forum sliders keep using the same tactics, the easier it is to call your uncreative asses out on it.
Mr. Least encouraged children to gamble, broke gambling laws to increase buying pressure, and even less shocking apparently hasn’t made good on most of the ‘winners’ anyway.
Yet you are here pretending he just accidentally bent a few obscure sweepstakes laws instead of the critical point that he USED HIS INFLUENCE OVER CHILDREN TO CONVINCE THEM TO GAMBLE!
85% of the time people post questions already answered in the OP, they aren’t here to question their own position but to shift the positions of others through gish gallops and goalpost moving. Maybe you just put out all those red flags on accident, but I still doubt it.
Bet you’d feel like shit if you had realized you’d insulted a man with no legs about running but because my disability isn’t visible or marketable, you feel entitled to other me with no consequences.
That takes a special breed of assholery right there. Should have left your block on.
… it’s literally in the video… Twice…
And now because I know you are here to do nothing but waste my time, you will probably ask me for a timestamp, and I would normally provide it of course because I want to keep the discussion intellectually honest.
But it’s pretty clear that you don’t, and of course after ignoring my timestamp hyperlink, you will make up some vapid arguments on how it is unpossible for Mr Least to ever have done such a thing and that I’m stupid for misunderstanding federal gambling laws.
And we can go back and forth for hours, me posting evidence, you saying whatever stupid shit that comes to your mind to push the discussion far away from the original point that Mr. Least is illegally involving children in gambling.
And I am so just fuckdamn tired of intellectually dishonest people like you ‘just asking questions’.
So
Amazingly
Fuckdamn
Tired.
So you’re blocked now.
deleted by creator
Lmao Jesus Christ. It’s a 50 minute video that I was actively watching and I was reading comments and watching at the same time.
Anyone that’s not a maniac want to give me a timestamp? Because I don’t have time to watch a 50 minute video tonight.
I couldn’t find it earlier because I googled “Mr Beast live stream gambling” when I should’ve googled “Mr Beast Child Lottery”
https://youtu.be/i_MuVUbjJo0?si=T9iQxErlb5c_zH0T
Your abelism infuriates me. If I were younger, I’d waste an hour rhetorically browbeating you.
You could have already completely watched the video by now but still you are here whining for timestamps just like I predicted you would. The more shitstain forum sliders keep using the same tactics, the easier it is to call your uncreative asses out on it.
Mr. Least encouraged children to gamble, broke gambling laws to increase buying pressure, and even less shocking apparently hasn’t made good on most of the ‘winners’ anyway.
Yet you are here pretending he just accidentally bent a few obscure sweepstakes laws instead of the critical point that he USED HIS INFLUENCE OVER CHILDREN TO CONVINCE THEM TO GAMBLE!
Username checks out.
If yours does, wanna come be a mod at /c/i_am_angry ?
Mine is mostly /s, but I feel very honoured by your invitation. It made me happy and therefore unfit to accept :)
I cannot argue with that logic, if you change your mind, PM me.
Mine is only very slightly /s and your energy may be a good counterbalance.
the absolute hilarious thing is I finally did find it all on my own and I agree with you about Mr Beast. I was simply asking a question.
I’m not sure what type of people you come across online to act this way but Jesus Christ tell me where so I can avoid it.
Block me because I’m going to return the favor.
85% of the time people post questions already answered in the OP, they aren’t here to question their own position but to shift the positions of others through gish gallops and goalpost moving. Maybe you just put out all those red flags on accident, but I still doubt it.
My username really should be warning enough. It’s medical, I really do have almost no control over it.
Fair enough. Check my user history. I’m not on here to start stuff or move goalposts. I found the source. I agree with you.
Gambling destroys lives, and promoting that shit to children is wrong.
You still haven’t apologized for your rancid ableism…
Yeah, I’m not going to.
Just like every other fucking neurotypical
Bet you’d feel like shit if you had realized you’d insulted a man with no legs about running but because my disability isn’t visible or marketable, you feel entitled to other me with no consequences.
That takes a special breed of assholery right there. Should have left your block on.