• pixxelkick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Far too often people forget that Right to Free Speech is not your first right, and it is superseded by other human rights above it.

    Your right to Free Speech only applies as long as it doesn’t interfere with other people’s rights to safety and freedom from prejudice, hate, harm, etc…

    It’s not that complicated and yet countless people always fuck something so straightforward up.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    When I was growing up it was never about tolerating intolerance. It was about dragging it out into the sunlight so you could kill it. They have a right to say anything they want so we can make an example of them and they don’t go into hiding and do dumb shit.

    Of course that depended on the mainstream leadership believing in democracy and not leaning into extremism. Because the GOP has switched sides on democracy it’s a liability now instead of a strength. A swing too far from the laws of England our founders meant to forestall.

    • MrCharles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They have a right to say anything they want so we can make an example of them and they don’t go into hiding and do dumb shit.

      Well… that’s not very freedom of you.

      • Syndic@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of course that is freedom. It’s the freedom of association and freedom of speech of the people appealed by the words of these bigots.

        No one is free of the consequences of their words.

  • MrCharles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If people vote for their own chains in a free and democratic society, they deserve to get what they want. Now whether we still have such a society is debatable. But I still fundamentally believe that any and all forms of censorship are the wrong way to go and will only accelerate the decline into totalitarianism.

    So, how about we agree to disagree, mate? ; )

    • Syndic@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If people vote for their own chains in a free and democratic society, they deserve to get what they want.

      They aren’t only voting for their own fate but for the fate of everyone else. So 51% can doom everyone. That hardly seems fair.

      But I still fundamentally believe that any and all forms of censorship are the wrong way to go and will only accelerate the decline into totalitarianism.

      This always ignores how very dangerous uncensored words can be. Hitler is famous for his speeches and not for his military brilliance! So is Mussolini. They both abused lenient and weak democratic systems to talk their way into power resulting in the literal Holocaust and one of the most devestating war the world has ever seen.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hate speech is not the same as free speech. Free speech was for reporters to keep them from being jailed so it’s not even applicable for what this guy thinks he’s defending with that phrase.

    • RedditRefugee69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s also worth noting that the government can’t limit free speech. We as citizens can boycott, bully, and harass hateful speech and should

      • Syndic@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s also worth noting that the government can’t limit free speech.

        But it can and does! Go on Facebook and detail how you will storm and overthrow your state government next Monday at noon and see how long it takes for your speech to land you in jail. Or incite a stampede in a cinema by yelling “Fire!”. And that’s just two examples. Libel and slander are other examples where “just words” can get you in trouble with the government.

        The idea of complete unlimited speech in the US is a fantasy. They clearly can and do draw lines at what you can and can’t say in public. The only question is where this lines are.

        • RedditRefugee69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, fair. That’s a whole nother can of worms to this discussion where physical harm results from words rather than simply expressing abhorrent beliefs

          • Syndic@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well, WW2 in Europe and it’s resulting horrors was basically the result of Hitler and Mussolini “simply expressing abhorrent beliefs”. That’s how they got into power in the first place and also how they got the better part of their population behind their insane dreams.