The brazen appearance of white supremacist groups in Nashville left the city grappling with how to confront hateful speech without violating First Amendment protections.

They first arrived at the beginning of July: dozens of masked white supremacists, shuffling out of U-Hauls, to march through Nashville carrying upside-down American flags.

A week later, members of a separate neo-Nazi group, waving giant black flags with red swastikas, paraded along the city’s famed strip of honky-tonks and celebrity-owned bars. The neo-Nazis poured into the historic Metro courthouse to disrupt a City Council meeting, harassed descendants of Holocaust survivors and yelled racist slurs at young Black children performing on a downtown street.

The appearance of white nationalists on the streets of a major American city laid bare the growing brazenness of the two groups, the Patriot Front and the Goyim Defense League. Their provocations enraged and alarmed civic leaders and residents in Nashville, causing the city to grapple with how to confront the groups without violating free speech protections.

Non-paywall link

  • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Arrest any and all groups that storm in and disrupt government functions, simple as that

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Which means that people in the government can argue that virtually anything the government does is a “government function.” Mayor’s press conference? Government function. Better arrest those protesters. Governor’s mansion? It has public tours. That’s a government function. Better arrest those protestors.

      Look what happened without that law when a president wanted a photo op with a Bible in front of a church. And you want to make that even easier?

      • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        You can protest outside the building perfectly fine, storming into the chambers and stopping the agenda is blatant disruption and I won’t argue it.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          But how do you make it clear that is the government function that can’t be disrupted but the press conference afterward can because it does not count as a government function?

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Outside the building is often government grounds too. Those buildings can be in plazas which are entirely government-owned.

              So, again, you’re saying you can’t protest the press conference (except from a great distance).