I’ve been looking for a new job as a software developer. The huge majority of job listings I see in my area are hybrid or remote. I just had an introductory phone call with Vizio (which didn’t specify the location type in the job listing). The recruiter told me that the job was fully on-site, which I told her was a deal breaker for me.

It makes me wonder how many other people back out after hearing that the job is on-site. And it makes me wonder why this wasn’t specified in the job description. I assume most people only want hybrid or remote jobs these days, right?

Anyways I was just wondering how many of you guys apply for on-site IT jobs? Hybrid is so much better, I don’t know why people would apply for on-site jobs unless they have no other options.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    My ask is 4x salary for in office.

    It’s usually met with “Well, that’s not going to happen…”

    To which I reply “I know, right?”

  • Bluefruit@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    From what I’ve heard, most people that are for in office work like having the separation between work and home.

    That being said, I think most folks want remote work or at least remote hybrid. It just makes more sense especially for me. I live far from my office (140 mile drive roundtrip), and working 3 days a week from home has been a god send.

    • poo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I did notice that the only people not opting for WFH/hybrid at my last job were all the married-with-kids types who hated being around their family and used work as an escape. It was really sad to see lol

      • SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        There’s a psychological stress with work that can take some time to slough off.

        Some people don’t want to log out of work and be grumpy or distracted during family time.

        That being said having a process or system as a habit to denote work/home is a good alternative.

        A 10 minute walk, a change of clothes, or some song you play, anything that creates a mental delineation. So the annoyance from that way too long meeting asking why something isn’t done (4 hours a day giving out status updates isn’t helping) doesn’t come out on the family.

      • OpenStars@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        That’s understandable but like… you could go to a coffee shop or literally rent office space nearby to where you live - it doesn’t have to be all one way or the other. Anyway, if they truly do enjoy being surrounded by people then I don’t want to knock their totally valid preferences, just to say that there are other ways.

  • AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    I hope to never go back to office. Remote has been a life changer. I have time to keep weeds out of my garden. The flexibility to have workers at my house whenever they are available. The freedom to set up my desk how I like it. Time to eat breakfast. I don’t get headaches every day any more from the lighting. I get to go outside during breaks for some sunshine time. I’m here when the kids come home.

    My work is more focused. No more road stress. I may be able to move to a place I can tolerate. No more wearing makeup that is bad for my skin. No more having to pack a lunch. My life is infinitely better without having to commute.

  • snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    About a third of the developers in my office choose to come into the office every day because they do not have a home office setup or they prefer to have that separation between work and home.