• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    California isn’t a private company, but it relies on private capital to do infrastructure development. Hope that clears things up for you.

    • EherNicht
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because they do not have money due to too expensive road maintenance?

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        When your whole economy is organized around private ownership then the role of the state is to primarily mediate between different capitalist interests. It’s not like California has public sector capacity to deliver large scale projects that way state owned enterprise does in China.

        • Athelstan@persadon.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          @yogthos
          I asked about the decision-maker; is the state of California responsible for making the decisions regarding building speed railroads, cancelling it, switching to hyperloops, again cancelling it, etc? (yes or no)

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            You’ve asked a loaded question, and I gave you a response that includes important context. The scope of the decisions a government can make is inherently limited by the options the government has. Not sure why that’s difficult to understand.