Raccoonn@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 4 months agoIts all Linux !!lemmy.mlimagemessage-square85fedilinkarrow-up11.01Karrow-down118
arrow-up1994arrow-down1imageIts all Linux !!lemmy.mlRaccoonn@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 4 months agomessage-square85fedilink
minus-squareuis@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down3·4 months agoWell, he is correct. Linux is not UNIX. It is UNIX-like system. And Android is abomination.
minus-squarecandybrie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·4 months agoI think macOS is actually Unix certified. It at least was at one point.
minus-squareuis@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·4 months agoAt one point many years ago. BSD is true UNIX btw.
minus-squarecandybrie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·4 months agoI looked it up. macOS is still unix certified. BSD is usually not unix certified, so has to refer to itself as unix like. What is and isn’t unix is kind of up to what definition you’re working with (pedigree, legally, practically).
minus-squareuis@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 months ago BSD is usually not unix certified, so has to refer to itself as unix like. Wait, really? Not POSIX? Huh Also another reason I doubt current version macos is certified is: “Because it’s an expensive and lengthy process. And every version will need to be re-certified.”
minus-squareZink@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·4 months agohttps://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/
minus-squareZink@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 months agoI clicked on their certificate and was first registered in ‘03, with renewal due in May of this year. So… I don’t know! Lol
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-24 months agoAnd what always gets lost in these discussions is if that old Unix stuff was so amazingly good that we should automatically assume Linux is inferior for not doing it. Even though all the old Unix vendors are basically dead now and replaced by Linux.
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoThe main difference between being unix certified or not is being willing to pay for it. That’s pretty much it.
Well, he is correct. Linux is not UNIX. It is UNIX-like system. And Android is abomination.
I think macOS is actually Unix certified. It at least was at one point.
At one point many years ago. BSD is true UNIX btw.
I looked it up. macOS is still unix certified.
BSD is usually not unix certified, so has to refer to itself as unix like.
What is and isn’t unix is kind of up to what definition you’re working with (pedigree, legally, practically).
Wait, really? Not POSIX? Huh
Also another reason I doubt current version macos is certified is:
“Because it’s an expensive and lengthy process. And every version will need to be re-certified.”
https://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/
Thanks. SCO is still going?
I clicked on their certificate and was first registered in ‘03, with renewal due in May of this year.
So… I don’t know! Lol
And what always gets lost in these discussions is if that old Unix stuff was so amazingly good that we should automatically assume Linux is inferior for not doing it. Even though all the old Unix vendors are basically dead now and replaced by Linux.
The main difference between being unix certified or not is being willing to pay for it. That’s pretty much it.