This has been a doozy of a year. And it’s the best year so far blah blah. So how are you all coping? Does it hit anyone else like a bolt of lightning that probably I - we - won’t die of old age?

  • LustyArgonian@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 个月前

    Yes, it will be. Where is your confusion here?

    Stuff was not as bad before.

    Now stuff pretty bad.

    We have done nothing to deal with that and in fact are still just making stuff worse (maybe some stuff is not making stuff worse at the same rate as before)

    Stuff gets worse exponentially

    Already extinction in the millions and billions is happening

    Will extinct more next year at an exponential rate, bc we have done nothing and all solutions will take decades

    All those species are affected meaning they are dying.

    Ecology means that’s bad, stuff relies on each other

    Chemistry means that’s bad, stuff relies on each other and certain Temps to happen

    All around all science says, it’s bad

      • LustyArgonian@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 个月前

        Okay, well you’re free to believe as you’d like. I’m fine with agreeing to disagree. The math checks out really clearly to me, “exponentially getting worse” is pretty clear in meaning.

        • aidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 个月前

          If a population exponentially grows does that mean it will continue infinitely? Why would the reverse be certain to be different?

          • LustyArgonian@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 个月前

            If a population is given infinite resources, sure, theoretically. The energy that comes from the sun is cumulative and may as well be considered infinite since the sun isn’t going out any time soon. Did you really think that was a gotchya?

            Look at every other planet. That ours happens to be energetically at a temp to support life is the exception. The rule in the universe is that it’s literally unlivable for us everywhere else we know of. Literally. This is pretty much it.

            • aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 个月前

              If a population is given infinite resources, sure, theoretically.

              I didn’t say they were given infinite resources. I said if a population is growing exponentially does that mean it will continue to do so.

              The energy that comes from the sun is cumulative and may as well be considered infinite since the sun isn’t going out any time soon.

              Yeah?

              Did you really think that was a gotchya?

              What? It was a question you didn’t answer. Why do you assume just because something is exponential that it will continue. Another example- transistor size in processors exponentially shrinks. Does that mean eventually it’s going to reach zero nm? (hint the answer is no)

              I’m also not saying that this disproves something can exponentially fall to zero. I’m just saying, stating the current relationship doesn’t guarantee it will continue.

              Look at every other planet. That ours happens to be energetically at a temp to support life is the exception.

              Earth is very far removed from other planets in terms of atmospheric conditions.

              • LustyArgonian@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 个月前

                If given infinite resources, yes. I answered you.

                The current population will likely be zero, perhaps simply approaching the limit of zero if tardigrades and extremophiles survive. But in terms of multicellular life, yeah, there can be a zero for sure. Because the energy from the sun can theoretically increase exponentially.

                It would be cool if our ozone was working perfectly, then, huh? But it’s not any more, and is getting worse: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/topics/in-depth/climate-change-mitigation-reducing-emissions/current-state-of-the-ozone-layer

                • aidan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 个月前

                  If given infinite resources, yes. I answered you.

                  I again didn’t ask that. Its also not true for all populations(such as human populations)

                  The current population will likely be zero, perhaps simply approaching the limit of zero if tardigrades and extremophiles survive. But in terms of multicellular life, yeah, there can be a zero for sure.

                  I did ask if there can be either. I asked why you assume it would be.

                  It would be cool if our ozone was working perfectly, then, huh? But it’s not any more, and is getting worse:

                  That source seems to indicate that they’re not entirely sure why it is getting worse, but it is a combination of factors. However NASA and the the UN say recovery of the ozone layer is still on track for 2040.

                  • LustyArgonian@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 个月前

                    I explained why right after that next sentence if you keep reading

                    The ozone layer was worse in 2023 compared to 2022 so idk how that’s “on track” but okay