• Chriskmee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most of their billions is ownership in companies they grew into what they are today. It’s not like they have billions to spend, it’s that their ownership is worth billions according to the market.

        • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          So what? We should take away that ownership because they can leverage it? Also the same people suggesting we tax wealth like this want to also close those “loopholes” of low interest loans on shares.

              • Enma Ai@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Taking away (extreme) wealth. There’s no reason one person should have that much. There’s countless better ways to use that money/wealth than for one persons extravagant lifestyle. And even if they don’t have an extravagant lifestyle, what are they gonna do with it? Doubt they will build infrastructure out of good will with it.

                • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So take away ownership of a company just because it’s too successful? That wealth is mostly in company ownership, so are you really suggesting we steal away legitimate ownership in successful companies?

                  • Enma Ai@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Yes. Fuck Capitalism.

                    It’s not stealing their legitimate ownership. They don’t have legitimate ownership.