Camus [il/lui]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to YUROP@lemm.ee · edit-24 months agoWhich European language am I readingjlai.luimagemessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1375arrow-down112file-textcross-posted to: esperanto@sopuli.xyzinteressant@jlai.lu
arrow-up1363arrow-down1imageWhich European language am I readingjlai.luCamus [il/lui]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to YUROP@lemm.ee · edit-24 months agomessage-square90fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: esperanto@sopuli.xyzinteressant@jlai.lu
cross-posted from: https://jlai.lu/post/9070854 Source : https://tech.lgbt/@pierogiburo/112875137520784379
minus-squareDr. Bob@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 months agoFrench is a strange one here - they have “w” (double vé in the alphabet) but it’s used almost exclusively in loan words. So I’m not certain it’s determinative the way it’s presented here.
minus-squareServais (il/le)@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up16·4 months agoI think that choice is more about “ieuw” as a whole, like “nieuw” in Dutch, not the separate 4 letters (like b G R v at the beginning)
minus-squareEarMaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·4 months agoI don’t get your comment. The “w” isn’t used in this graph as a single character.
minus-squareDr. Bob@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 months agoThe Dutch exclusion makes sense to me. I was reading it as separate letters which made the use of “e” a second time redundant.
French is a strange one here - they have “w” (double vé in the alphabet) but it’s used almost exclusively in loan words. So I’m not certain it’s determinative the way it’s presented here.
I think that choice is more about “ieuw” as a whole, like “nieuw” in Dutch, not the separate 4 letters (like b G R v at the beginning)
I don’t get your comment. The “w” isn’t used in this graph as a single character.
The Dutch exclusion makes sense to me. I was reading it as separate letters which made the use of “e” a second time redundant.
deleted by creator