Hey all! My team at work is struggling with growing pains of getting into a formalized review process, so I was wondering if any of you guys have some things to live or die by in your code reviews. How much of it is manual, or how much is just static code analysis + style guide stuff, etc?

  • pattern@beehaw.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So we use that, and that works well. What does your peer review process look like? Is it pretty loosy-goosy, or do you have hard and fast guidelines and checklists?

    • macniel@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its pretty much loosy-goosy with only a limit of how many checks are required (including a fully built build) to be able to merge.