ylai@lemmy.ml to Science@mander.xyzEnglish · 9 months agoScience journal retracts peer-reviewed article containing AI generated ‘nonsensical’ imagesventurebeat.comexternal-linkmessage-square1fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10cross-posted to: generative_ai@mander.xyz
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkScience journal retracts peer-reviewed article containing AI generated ‘nonsensical’ imagesventurebeat.comylai@lemmy.ml to Science@mander.xyzEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square1fedilinkcross-posted to: generative_ai@mander.xyz
minus-squareKissaki@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-29 months agoHow do they do peer-reviews? Evidently it was not enough for what you expect from a vetted journal and what peer-reviews implies. Any consequences or planned changes?
How do they do peer-reviews? Evidently it was not enough for what you expect from a vetted journal and what peer-reviews implies.
Any consequences or planned changes?