• auwa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I ain’t no IT expert but what are some things a vulernable windows computer can do?

    • bleistift2@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In general, a compromised system may be running any software the attacker might find useful, including, but not limited to:

      • keyloggers to find passwords that are in use in the company
      • software to copy sensitive files to a remote server
      • software to encrypt the system itself or (if the computer has access to other machines on the network) other computers
      • produce documents (think, mail) that purport to have been created by the user of the corrupted machine.
    • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The users tend to be less tech savvy than Linux users so they tend to not have adblockers and or allow arbitrary JavaScript from any page to run and or they are running trojanized software because the uploader was “trusted”.

      Due to market share they are the biggest target.

      Untrusted devices should be on an isolated subnet or if you have the time only devices that need to talk to each other should be on the same subnet.

      • bleistift2@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In an ecosystem where the solution to every problem is “Download this piece of software someone wrote because the standard Windows utilities are worse than useless and don’t provide this basic functionality”, you can’t really blame the users for running every script they encounter uncritically.

  • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    it probably wasn’t very secure network if anyone can join and cause this. so instead of being misogynistic moron, you could spend some more time on improving your security.

    • bleistift2@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      So now it’s misogynistic to identify a girl on a picture or an unnamed person in an anecdote as “she”?

      • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        no, it is misogynistic to draw a picture where she is the incompetent user causing problem and he is the brave security engineer whom she has to beg for forgiveness.

        when it is in fact his shitty security that is root of the problem, because users will be users, no matter what gender. so it is the “hero” of this magnum opus who is really the incompetent one. do you understand how laughingly pathetic that is? bragging about your “secure network” when one user with windows can burn it to the ground?

        • bleistift2@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          he is the brave security engineer

          You made that up. OP never said they were male.

          she has to beg for forgiveness.

          You made that up, too.

          users will be users

          They will be. And in this case the offending user appears to be female. They are allowed to touch computers these days, didn’t you know?