• dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I read the article, and a few points stuck out to me:

    1. This has been a restriction since 2021; now it’s documented in the files and not just the online EULA (ie consistent)
    2. This is a protection to disallow other companies like Intel and AMD from profiting off of Nvidia’s work
    3. Nothing is stopping anybody from porting the software to other hardware, eg

    Recompiling existing CUDA programs remains perfectly legal. To simplify this, both AMD and Intel have tools to port CUDA programs to their ROCm (1) and OpenAPI platforms, respectively.

    I’m all for piracy and personal freedoms, but it doesn’t seem to be what this is about. It’s about combating other companies profiting off Nvidia’s work. Companies should be able to fight back against other companies (or countries).

    I mean it’s not like Nvidia is unreasonably suing open-source projects into oblivion or anything, or subpoenaing websites for user data; at least, not yet.

    • tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Their motive is likely more profit but the result is an unjust restriction on user software freedom. It doesn’t matter if they make less money, maximising profit is not why we grant them copyright. Nvidia is often unreasonable, fuck off Nvidia.

      • bleistift2@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        maximising profit is not why we grant them copyright

        That’s the only reason copyright exists. Because society decided that if you’re the one to put work into developing something, you should be the one reaping the profits, at least for some time.