• BachenBenno@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, funnily there is no limit. It is just a standard normal distribution with a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. You can read more on wikipedia’s ‘intelligence quotient’ under the section ‘current tests’ where you could click on the links to learn more about the mathematics. Setting the mean to 100 rather than zero was probably so people wouldn’t get offended as easily 😂

      • Reliant1087@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Negative IQ would be more than six sigmas away. I don’t think the distribution would hold till tail that far 🤔

          • Reliant1087@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not talking about the normal distribution being valid at some value. Since it’s a continuous decaying function in either direction, it’ll be kosher at any real number. I’m talking about the hypothesis that IQ will be normally distributed not holding at that far deviations.

            • BachenBenno@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh, you mean that someone with an IQ of 100 is twice as smart as one with an IQ of 50 doesn’t hold with low numbers like 5 and 10 anymore? That doesn’t work in any case since IQ is just defined that way and it would be very difficult for such a scale to actually work. Probably impossible because there are a lot of aspects to intelligence, it isn’t one-dimensional.