• DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now Spez is sucking off Musk in the media talking about how Twitter’s “cost cutting measures” were genius, firing most of your staff is never a genius move.

  • Kissaki@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Protest and dissent is important,” Huffman said. “The problem with this one is it’s not going to change anything because we made a business decision that we’re not negotiating on.”

    “we’re not giving in” said everyone ever that gave in to protest later

    We will see. It can still go many ways. With how big Reddit is they can certainly push through. We will see what impact that will have in the long term.

  • Ben@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    protest isn’t really a big deal.

    The big deal comes when people work to do the same thing on other platforms.

    • Then we’ll find out what Reddit is really good for.

    Oh, and Quora, and Google, and Meta, and Twitter.

    Remember, do it in Firefox - not Chrome.

  • Kissaki@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “We can’t subsidize other people’s businesses,” Huffman said. “We didn’t ban third-party apps — we said, ‘You need to cover your costs.’”

    Too bad the article author does not put this into context with counter-arguments. “Your cost” saying that’s the cost is a wild claim. They supposedly set an arbitrary, high price.

    “I think every business has a duty to become profitable eventually — for our employees shareholders, for our investors shareholders and, one day as a public company, hopefully our user shareholders as well,” said Huffman, who co-founded the site in 2005.

    I’m not so sure every shareholder is necessarily looking primarily or only at money return. It’s equally probable a shareholder may be a shareholder to support the platform - even if it operates at a loss - because it’s a good or important platform.

  • Panda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    But Huffman says the “pure infrastructure costs” of supporting these apps costs Reddit about $10 million each year.

    Eh, so although, according to him, the third party apps cost Reddit 10 million per year, he still decided that 20 million a year from a single third party app developer is reasonable? I think he needs to learn some basic math…

    • Kissaki@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      So bad the article did not put that number into context.

      They’re just presenting one-dimensional claims by the CEO. The overall infrastructure cost tells you nothing about gains or cost or losses due to API users.

  • geissi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Protest and dissent is important,” Huffman said. “The problem with this one is it’s not going to change anything because we made a business decision that we’re not negotiating on.”

    Protest is important, just not against us.