I just got a CO2 meter and checked the levels in my house and went down a rabbit hole trying to address the issue. Apparently it would take 249 areca palms to offset the carbon RESPIRATION of one adult.

So okay 249 trees just for me to breathe, not to mention the rest of the bad things we all do.

So how can this math ever balance? 249 trees just to break even seems like an impossible number. Then all the flights I have been on, miles driven, etc.

I feel like that’s… Way too many trees. Is it hopeless or am I missing something?

  • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
    0·
    1 year ago

    You’re not supposed to plant trees like there’s no tomorrow, but simply stop using fossil fuels. Simple as that.

    Your respiration is already net zero. Plants capture CO2 to grow, you eat the plant, breathe out CO2, plants absorb that CO2 again. You should have heard about the carbon cycle in school. If not, look it up.

    All the other emissions, the not net zero ones, are some form of fossil resource. Oil, gas, coal. You can’t reasonably offset these, you just stop using them. There’s no way around that.

    • Kage520@lemmy.worldOP
      0·
      1 year ago

      Yeah it just kind of clicked for me that if I eat plants, that was net zero, but if I eat meat, there was another animal that had to emit CO2 (and other gases) at the same time as me before becoming food. So the opposite of plants taking my CO2 to become food, the animal emitted CO2 while becoming food.

        • xkforce@lemmy.world
          0·
          1 year ago

          Directly they dont but it does take oil and gas to make the fertillizer that feeds the crops and pesticides that prevent pests from destroying entire harvests, diesel to run the farm equipment and transport the crops to market. Modern farming, even organic, is very much Carbon positive.

          • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
            0·
            1 year ago

            Yes, but that’s almost all by proxy. You’re not supposed to offset the CO2 you’re breathing out.

            Unless you actually eat coal.

              • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
                0·
                1 year ago

                That’s not my point. OP was clearly talking about the CO2 of the calories themselves.

                I specifically addressed, that fossil fuels can’t be used, if you want to be carbon neutral.

                Don’t bend your mind over backwards and put words in ny mouth to prove your self-righteousness to yourself.