sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Technology@beehaw.org · 4 months agoGoogle Search’s “udm=14” trick lets you kill AI search for goodarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square3fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldgoogle@lemdro.idtechnology@lemmy.zip
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkGoogle Search’s “udm=14” trick lets you kill AI search for goodarstechnica.comsabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Technology@beehaw.org · 4 months agomessage-square3fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldgoogle@lemdro.idtechnology@lemmy.zip
minus-squareAggressivelyPassive@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months agoThat’s what’s really confusing me: why add an expensive feature, that obviously doesn’t work and even in the best case adds only minor improvements? I mean, it’s not another option like with Bing. It’s the default. Every stupid little search will take up AI resources. For what? Market cap?
That’s what’s really confusing me: why add an expensive feature, that obviously doesn’t work and even in the best case adds only minor improvements?
I mean, it’s not another option like with Bing. It’s the default. Every stupid little search will take up AI resources. For what? Market cap?