• FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Guess I should stock up while I can huh?

    I’ve been a RPI fan since the beginning and have used their boards for all sorts of projects and tinkering. But it’s hard not to feel like it’s losing sight of what made it attractive in the first place: low power and low priced computing. It had its charm in buying a Pi Zero and just chucking emulators on it and handing them out to folks who might want to have a go.

    But with the more expensive, more powerful hardware you just can’t really use them for things like that anymore. Just too expensive and too much oomph for the use case.

    We’ll see if the company finds its way. But this usually isn’t a good sign…

  • _sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Garbage. They started this in order to provide very poor people the means to program and create things.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      Rockchip processors is where it’s at these days. Every pi alternative runs an RK3566 or RK3568

      For true open source it’s gotta be RISCV instead of ARM. Bbut it might be too early days for that.

    • Veraxus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      I think they’re playing the same game OpenAI is. Nonprofits can “own” for-profits.

      No, it’s not rational or ethical or reasonable, but it’s a thing, because Capitalism gotta Capitalism.

      • NostraDavid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        Nonprofits can “own” for-profits.

        One of the saner reasons for this structure is that the non-profit owns the things the for-profit works on. If the for-profit goes under, all things are still owned by the non-profit, so some large tech company can’t swoop in and yoink anything available.

        This includes any and all data generated by the for-profit, which means your data is “safe”.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          The non-profit could sell the for-profit, or it would inherit the debt of the for-profit if it didn’t bankrupt it.