• lugal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Putting the right guy in power never worked historically since power corrupts. The power structure is the problem. That’s one of the core ideas of anarchism

    • Lumisal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, it has worked historically, just extremely rarely. Singapore was one such recent example.

      The issue is that people die and the next person usually fucks everything up again.

      Anarchy has similar issues.

      The real problem is just us; humans.

      • lugal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s the next core idea: power structures attract the wrong people. Take Stalin who was worse than Lenin. Lenin had benevolent ideas but got corrupted, Stalin took that position with bad intentions from the start.

        Fatalism only serves the status quo.

        • Lumisal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s not fatalism, but fact. Humans are the real issue. We weren’t biologically evolved to deal with such large groups, along with certain other DNA quirks.

          That said, with technology and/or time such a flaw could be fixed so that we either are able to overcome our biological shortcomings, and/or technology allows us to achieve structure without hierarchy while also preventing hierarchy from springing up as well.

  • алсааас [she/they]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “You know what would be really interesting to do? Don’t denounce me as a Stalinist but, for example – it’s my old temptation – to rewrote Star Wars… presenting Palpatine and Darth Vader as good progressive egalitarian centralist fighting reactionary feudalist, all the Jedi bullshit. It would tell a completely different story, from the others point. What do they [Jedi] stand for? All that, ‘Republic’, what strange of Republic is when you have a Princess Leila, knights, kings and so on? No, Palpatine the Emperor and Darth Vader, they are - my god - progressive Bonapartist revolutionaries trying to get rid of the old world.”

    From: Žižek on Reshooting Star Wars https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_DroaGggbc

    But tbh I think that if we take the original trilogy, the Rebels are cleary fighting a reactionary imperialist power, ie. an analogy to the Vietnam war

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The Sith and the Empire didn’t help anyone either though, they made existence considerably worse for everyone other than a select few. They weren’t saviours or good guys, they were evil despots who sought to use lies to overthrow the existing power structure so they could fill the void with their totalitarianism.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      What this meme is pointing out though is that they didn’t just use lies to overthrow the existing power structure, they also used truths.

        • Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah the Sith here are the type of fascist regime to rise to power on the backs of a frustrated population. Pointing out all the flaws of the current system to garner support with no intention of actually making it better.

  • SSTF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    A valid criticism. Coming from the mouth of something trying to replace it with something worse. A classic villain move.

    I did enjoy the old EU Luke being a more reformist and grounded iteration of Jedi teachings. He started by rejecting Yoda’s warnings not to try and save his friends. He put friends over the high minded ideals of Jedi enlightenment right there in Empire Strikes Back. Then in ROTJ he spent the entire movie rejecting the obvious approach of simply killing Vader, instead trying to reach Anakin. Over and over Luke put people he cared about over esoteric codes.

    (Remember when the original trilogy and much of the EU establishing Luke was written, the prequels and Clone Wars hadn’t been fleshed out, and Jedi were implied to be even more high minded and classical than they were shown in the prequels).

  • linuxgator@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    To me, the scene that most defined what the Jedi order had become and why it needed to end was at the big fight scene at the end of Attack of the Clones where Yoda and Dooku were dueling. When Dooku pulled a pillar down with the Force and then Yoda used the Force to catch it to prevent it from falling on to Obi-wan. He then made a spectacle of it by spinning it around before throwing it back at Dooku. What he should have done was just use the Force to move Obi-wan and Anakin to a safe position and continued to pursue Dooku. That scene just demonstrated how full of himself Yoda had become. And it took until his duel with Palpatine before he realized that he was a large part of what had gone wrong with the Jedi order. I also always felt that he intentionally withheld a lot of information about the Jedi order from Luke in order to prevent him from rebuilding a similar system.

    • BleatingZombie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I have a really hard time separating a character’s decisions and the director/cinematographer decisions

      Like, did Yoda do that or did someone decide he would do that because test audiences thought it looked cooler (or something like that). I hope I conveyed that properly

      • Railing5132@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think you conveyed it excellently - not solely because it was the exact thought I had. I would have used more clumsy wording though.