• Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yeah, true. It seems like that is a pro that greatly overshadows the cons. Like someone else pointed out, it’s just worded weirdly in the article.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Kind of funny how the privacy crowd is big on Lemmy but it skips over the fact that all of its Lemmy data is hosted on the machines of people that have no accountability…

      • NovaPrime@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        You’re always free to spin up your own server and host it if you’re concerned about the way your data is being handled. Not something you can do with the corporate alternatives

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          And only post on your own instance and talk with users of your own instance… Might as well just send emails to your friends at that point…

        • Square Singer@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          But as soon as you interact with literally anyone (or anyone interacts with you) your data is still replicated on other servers.

          • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            Your posts are all public and discoverable by web crawlers even if your instance didn’t federate at all. That’s kind of the point of activityPUB

              • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                ActivityPub does not have support for private messages. Services that try to shoehorn a direct message as “private” are misusing the protocol. You could configure client-side encryption but thats outside the scope of ActivityPub

                • Square Singer@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  That’s true, but neither the article nor the discussion are about ActivityPub.

                  Both are specifically about Lemmy, and Lemmy does have private messages.

          • Hubi@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            No personally identifiable information or private account information is transmitted between instances. The only thing that is synced is the content of your posts, reports and up- and downvotes. And all of that serves a purpose and is shared willingly.