thehatfox@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoMeta's ad-free scheme dares you to buy your privacy back, one euro at a timewww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkMeta's ad-free scheme dares you to buy your privacy back, one euro at a timewww.theregister.comthehatfox@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square5fedilink
minus-squareZerlyna@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoSo if I want both web and phone blocked it’s over $20 a month? Nope. Just don’t use it.
minus-squareCloudkid@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-21 year agoNo, I don’t think so, two different price because AppStore and PlayStore take cut around 30% when you purchase through them. Meta is passing Apple and Google tax to costumers if they choose.
minus-squareZerlyna@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoThe point I’m trying to make is that I have to buy both?
minus-squareCloudkid@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoI think you should read the article Regardless of where a user makes the purchase, the subscription will apply to all linked Facebook and Instagram accounts in a user’s Accounts Center
minus-squareChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoWhy would anyone pay extra 2 €/month for what is basically minor one-time convenience?
So if I want both web and phone blocked it’s over $20 a month? Nope. Just don’t use it.
No, I don’t think so, two different price because AppStore and PlayStore take cut around 30% when you purchase through them. Meta is passing Apple and Google tax to costumers if they choose.
The point I’m trying to make is that I have to buy both?
I think you should read the article
Why would anyone pay extra 2 €/month for what is basically minor one-time convenience?