garbage.

  • jopepa@lemmy.world
    0·
    11 months ago

    I think Reddit’s biggest mistake wasn’t the API moves, but image and video hosting. I can’t even guess how much more it costs them to have all of those unnecessary features to be what? Anon Facebook?

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
      0·
      11 months ago

      I think it was a pretty good move – for them. You cannot just hotlink a Reddit image anymore, so reposts from Reddit on the Fediverse and other alternatives will need their own image/video hosting, which increases cost. Otherwise, it would be too easy to migrate a subreddit.

      • Otter@lemmy.caEnglish
        0·
        11 months ago

        Yep, it makes it really difficult to link content here, even for subreddits that want it

        I can do images, but I still haven’t figured out how to do videos

        • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
          0·
          11 months ago

          videos

          Me neither. I wonder if people prefer a directly-linked MP4 on GitHub or elsewhere, or a video streaming site (which is less compatible on mobile but allows multiple quality choices). Eventually, I decided to do both for the sake of compatibility: upload to PeerTube, link to the video using the post URL, and use both the embedding ![]() and linking []() syntax in the post text pointing to the direct MP4 link also provided by PeerTube. Example

      • jopepa@lemmy.world
        0·
        11 months ago

        I’m just saying the choice to host instead of letting res or 3rd party apps clean up the interface while they built a huge archive for the low low price of archiving links and conversations. It was inflated more than it could sustain without becoming more commodified so it kept doing that and here we are.

        • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
          0·
          11 months ago

          You took the time to use a fancy curly apostrophe but did not divide the sentences better to make them easier to read?

          This is how I think you could restructure the comment for legibility. Did I misinterpret anything? The second clause about RES seems opposite to what it should say, you might need to explain.

          I’m just saying: they made the choice to focus on hosting content, and let RES or 3ʳᵈ party apps clean up the interface. They eventually built a huge archive for the very low price of archiving links and conversations. This business model worked and people were used to it, so they continued hosting more, eventually realizing they couldn’t sustain it without ramping up the ads, which is why they limited access this year.

          • jopepa@lemmy.world
            0·
            11 months ago

            Cool thanks anyways. Edit: sorry that was rude of me. You might’ve been genuinely trying to help, if so, thanks. Judging from your first point though this only seems to be condescending and derails the conversation, hope that wasn’t your intention but that’s how you came across to me.

              • jopepa@lemmy.world
                0·
                11 months ago

                Did I upset you when I was fast and loose on the grammar conventions at 1 in the morning? How does it make you feel when you talk down to people?

                Edit: To answer your question, yeah that hostility was obvious at first glance. Just decided to give you the benefit of the doubt, because some people miss grammar conventions, other people miss social conventions, doesn’t mean either deserve to be treated as lesser.