Last year’s catastrophic East Palestine train derailment has spurred calls from a rank-and-file labor group for public ownership of rail infrastructure. We spoke to an expert about what that could look like in the US, which is dominated by for-profit rail.

Railroad Workers United (RWU), a caucus of rank-and-file workers spanning all thirteen national rail unions, recently released a video offering one answer to the rotten state of US rail. “Putting America Back on Track: The Case for Public Rail Ownership” opens in East Palestine, with a resident of the area showing the viewer photos he took the night of the Norfolk Southern derailment. The video goes on to make the case for public ownership of rail, which has been a focus for RWU over the past year.

What are your thoughts on the idea of public ownership of rail (in the US and Canada)? What type or level of public ownership would you support?

  • lntl@lemmy.mlEnglish
    0·
    9 months ago

    same as the interstate highway. federally owned alignments, rails, signals, etc enable private operators to offer transport services based out of private yards

    • AJ Sadauskas@aus.social
      1·
      9 months ago

      @lntl @Rentlar Why is how the public ownership of railways could work a hypothetical in the US?

      Many countries already do this right now.

      Here’s a link to the Australian Rail Track Corporation: https://www.artc.com.au/about/

      It’s owned by the Australian Federal Government, owns rail track infrastructure, but doesn’t operate any freight or passenger services itself.

      Here’s a link to VicTrack: https://www.victrack.com.au/

      It’s owned by the Victorian state government, owns rail infrastructure in Victoria, but doesn’t operate any freight or passenger services itself.