Highlights: In a bizarre turn of events last month, UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak announced that he would ban American XL bullies, a type of pit bull-shaped dog that had recently been implicated in a number of violent and sometimes deadly attacks.

XL bullies are perceived to be dangerous — but is that really rooted in reality?

  • Number1SummerJam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Statistically pit bulls and closely related breeds are responsible for the most attacks. Anyone bringing human race into this is silly.

    • PilferJynx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think the occurrence of attacks are more, just the severity. It’s probably less likely a chihuahua attack causes enough damage to warrant a report. Pitbulls are dangerous, not because they’re more prone to attack, but because when they do, they cause a lot more physical damage.

      • Zippy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think the occurrence is somewhat more. While some smaller dogs may be aggressive and are aggressive, they also tend to learn rapidly they do not have the size to be aggressive. Thus that trait becomes less common overall.

      • Number1SummerJam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think that people should be able to own them, but they need to be put in the same class as foxes, wolves, hyenas and wild dogs. I met a sweet pit bull at a friend’s house but the first thing she did was jump on me and scratch my stomach, which drew blood.

        • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          My friend met a sweet pitbull, and then it bit her on the neck. They aren’t just strong, they are unpredictable as hell.