Instead of just electrifying vehicles, cities should be investing in alternative methods of transportation. This article is by the Scientific Foresight Unit of the European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS), a EU’s own think tank.

  • Anekdoteles@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Have some of these here. Absolutely wild, that the bike lane ends where it would become useful: Before a traffic light, so that you have to take part in the traffic jam of cars.

    But what am I even talking about. Traffic lights per se are an anti-pattern of city design.

    • freedomPusher@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Traffic lights per se are an anti-pattern of city design.

      It’s a pro and a con. Cars waiting is a good thing. Car drivers chose cars for convenience so anything that makes them inconvenient is a positive factor to getting them out of cars. I’m in a place where bicycles can turn right on red but cars cannot. And there are cycle paths through woods and fields and niche trafficlight-free places cars cannot go.

      I love traffic jams because cyclists are immune to them and car drivers can only sit in frustration as they get passed by cyclists.

      A couple intersections are still fucked up though, where cyclists might have to wait for ~2-3 differently timed lights to cross an intersection. Luckly red light running is not generally enforced against cyclists.

      • AlexS@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Car drivers chose cars for convenience so anything that makes them inconvenient is a positive factor to getting them out of cars.

        That’s the wrong way. Bike should be made more convenient. But artificial worsening is no good thing.

      • Anekdoteles@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I agree on everything, but the conclusion that they are a pro and a con.

        Under the constraint, that the same rules apply to bicycles and cars and they are enforced, then traffic lights are definitely an anti-pattern.

        Under the assumption, that the alternative would be that pedestrians and cyclicsts would have always the right of way over cars in an urban environment, they would be neutral.

        But are they ever a good thing? I see where you are coming from with this: Traffic lights make cars wait. But they are installed to optimise car-flow, in the first place. So, if they were not there, cars would wait longer, because they are inherently inefficient vehicles that would clogg up intersections immediatly and consequentially bring car-flow to a total halt. Hence, every traffic not participating in car-flow would drastically accelerate if traffic lights were abolished.