• TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The problem with these types of mandates is it locks us into standards and makes change hard. Imagine if they had done this when the terrible USB port was dominant.

    Or, it gives all the power to the USB group. They have a terrible track record (USB-C is a mess).

    The other problem is all the cheap devices that have a USB-C port, but will not charge from a real USB-C to USB-C cable. They are the same old USB ports electrically with a new shape.

    These are bad laws with good intents.

    • Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      God that last one drives me up a fucking wall. My partner’s laptop refuses to charge with anything except the officially supported power adapter, even though it’s just a USB-C connector. Everything I’ve plugged it into has been rated for the 100W that the laptop needs to charge, but the damned device locks out anything except official chargers under the guise of safety.

    • moitoi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s locking nobody with no standard. The standard is evolving time to time. This argument of locking the user which by the way is the same as “competition is the better” is the Apple argument to impose it’s locked (walled garden) ecosystem.

      It’s well known strategy to argue in a way that isn’t your goal to achieve another one. Apple is a master here. They use this same strategy with the future mandatory easy battery replacement.

    • Ranessin@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Standards can be updated. Like the EU standard was from Micro-USB to USB-C. It happens all the time in all fields of technology.