• stickly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    45 minutes ago

    Out of curiosity, what constitutional basis do they have to do this? Elections are explicitly run by the states and there’s nothing about RCV or any voting system that prevents a fair election.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      There working on the constitutional basis of wanting to become a dictatorship, can’t have people voting against you now can you?

  • ebolapie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Where are all of y’all dumb motherfuckers that were going on about how the two party system is rigged and you wanted RCV, and therefore you couldn’t vote for Democrats because they weren’t adequately enthused about the idea

    Where the fuck are you bitches

      • ebolapie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        My only agenda here is reminding y’all that all of this could have been avoided. I’m sorry there wasn’t a better party than the Dems. I truly am. But what the fuck are you gonna do about it? How does abstaining from voting further that goal?

        • WraithGear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          You can’t get change by working with democrats, the democrats have bent over backwards to prove they do not outright oppose the direction, only the speed we got here.

          Their refusal to do their ‘job’ shows that their actual cause is not in governance but the allocation of power. In order to put up a resistance to republicans the democrats must first be dismantled. I told you people that i was going to hold my nose and vote blue, and it’s not that the democrats failed to get the vote.

          It’s because they failed to get the vote because they had no interest in running on a coherent platform. It’s because after losing the confidence of their own base, they decided that it was progressive issues they must throw off as ballast. It’s because they appeal to the weak republicans voter over their own base. Its because they are actively undermining progressive proposals put forth by local progressive politicians. It’s because they parrot the ‘mandate of the people’ lie/republicans talking point to justify doing nothing. It’s because they attack individuals who put truth to power and try to do something.

          So fucking no. You people do not get another ‘vote blue no matter who’ from me. Democrats are the opposition party to progressive policy. Its become crystal clear to me that if i want progressive policy, democrats must first be brought to heel, or destroyed. Only then can republicans be stopped.

          • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            So fucking no. You people do not get another ‘vote blue no matter who’ from me. Democrats are the opposition party to progressive policy. Its become crystal clear to me that if i want progressive policy, democrats must first be brought to heel, or destroyed. Only then can republicans be stopped.

            You do this by hijacking the party the way Trump hijacked the GOP. Trying to start you own thing from scratch is so obviously doomed failure that you and all your ideas will remain irrelevant.

            • WraithGear@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Nope, because the same pressures that caused that, are the same pressures that caused the democrats to be an issue in the first place.

              • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                They’re not. Capital might have found (or thought they found) a way to leverage and control Trump, but they didn’t want him in the first place. He took over anyways. The reasons for this many, but it shows that the path is available, even if difficult. The idea that you’re going to break the two party system from outside of it it without a total societal collapse at this point is pure fantasy.

                • WraithGear@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  Its more absurd that you think that you can change a corrupt party from within. And that you are willing to do the same thing that has failed every time and expecting different results. If you think trump getting worse will change that calculus for the better, you are mistaken, democrats are somehow losing footing by being obviously feckless, and actively preventing what you hope for. The voters would be confused you see. It the mandate of the people. We got to reach out to the republicans, blah blah blah

    • runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Ranked choice voting allows you to rank each candidate in order of preference. This voting style is picking up steam in local and state level community initiatives, and is likely to allow the US to break from a 2 party system.

      Change is scary to Republicans so they are trying to vilify it and ban it for federal elections.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranked_voting

  • runiq
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    And here it is, the dashing of hopes. It was nice while it lasted.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      14 hours ago

      They’ll check and see how many votes the repubs need first, and put up that many plus a few for safety. The rest of the dems get to pretend to be opposed. But whatever the repubs need from dems, they will get.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        That’s exactly the backdoor deals they are doing, they only publicly hate each other, but behind the scenes they support the same agenda. Once in a while they allow one of their agenda to be pushed or blocked taking turns doing it, and this designed to gauge support for said bills from voters.