In 2025, the federal minimum wage is officially a “poverty wage.” The annual earnings of a single adult working full-time, year-round at $7.25 an hour now fall below the poverty threshold of $15,650 (established by the Department of Health and Human Services guidelines). The limitations of how the federal government calculates poverty understate how far the minimum wage is from economic security for workers and their families.

  • seeigel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 minutes ago

    How should it be possible to leave poverty behind with minimum wage? It’s the minimum. Only people without work can have less.

    It’s unfortunate but those who make the least are inevitable the ones who are poor. Not calling it poor is misleading.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 minutes ago

    Raising minimum wage and housing would be an easy political platform to stand on but, of course, politicians are beholden to the rich.

  • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The federal poverty standard is horribly low. Like you’re still on the brink of homeless at twice that wage.

    • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s great because a lot of people don’t realize there’s a sub minimum wage as well ☺️.

      30$ in tips per month is all it takes to allow the sub minimum wage to be paid in a bunch of states.

      The sub minimum wage is 2 dollars. Yup. 2 dollars an hour.

      • callouscomic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        BBbbbbBbBbBUt you’re A peeec of Sshhhiiit for not supporting tipping ermahgerd some anecdote can make more with tips than a fair wage therefore fuck it all hurr durr

    • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Woah 16k gross? That’s wild.

      Maybe if rent was… Checks notes $395 a month.

      Then you’d have $9,500 a year, so $790 a month to spend on everything else. Let’s say you then buy only flour for sustenance… AI said $27 per month to eat just flour.

      Which leaves you with $763 a month for entertainment.

      What are these people even complaining about?

      Maybe don’t eat golden sushi and crack cocaine for every meal Jesus

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The numbers are all made up, and they’ve not kept track with inflation or the economy in a long time. Things like “minimum wage” simply lingered to allow those better off that sometimes have a conscience to sleep at night, thinking there is a system in place for the less fortunate. Our Federal government has been failing us longer than Mango Mussolini’s presence, he is simply baring and accelerating the asshattery.

    • booly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The poverty line was historically measured simply by multiplying the USDA’s cheapest food plan for a household to buy groceries with adequate nutrition, and multiplying by 3.

      Then, in the intervening 6 decades or so, food inflation has gone up significantly slower than housing inflation, to where that simple assumption of “barely enough to eat, times 3” began systematically understating actual poverty.

      Today, feeding the reference family of 4 (2 adults 20-50, 1 kid aged 6-8, 1 aged 9-11) costs $996.20 per month (as of March 2025). That’s basically $12,000 per year, so the poverty line for a family of 4 is $32,150 (updated every January with September data).

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yeah, the “$15 minimum wage” conversation has been going on for so long that the actual number adjusted for inflation would be well into the mid $20 range. IIRC, it would currently land somewhere around $24.75 per hour.

      And if the idea of a $24.75 minimum wage makes you balk, maybe you should consider how little you’re being paid for the work you do, when compared to what the minimum wage used to cover. It used to cover enough for a single full time worker to afford housing, utilities, food, and a car. If you’re struggling to do that and you’re making in the mid $20’s, then congrats you know how it felt to be paid minimum wage when it was introduced.

  • bdjukeemgood@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    $15k a year??? That wouldn’t even cover my food let alone a shitty hotel room. Anything below $50k as a single earner is deep in poverty.

    • manxu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yes, it sounds bad. But there is a bright side, too! The week has 168 hours, which means if you work four full time jobs, you can make $60k a year and you still get eight hours of sleep! /s

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      18 hours ago

      IIRC, the federal poverty level doesn’t account for housing, transport, utilities, etc… It basically only accounts for food. And even then, it only accounts for the cheapest of the cheap food; You’d basically be eating white rice and instant ramen every day.

  • arin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Ain’t seen nothing yet, price adjustments after tariffs gonna make middle class in great depression queues.

    • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Pretty sure that’s the point of project 2025, so everyone is too poor and stuck to fight the dictatorship and no one else can get ahead forcing the them to be a cog in the machine for the 1% until they’re dead

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 hours ago

        “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable.” JFK

      • pulido@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Jokes on them.

        More people who feel they have nothing to live for are more people who are willing to go to extreme measures to punish the ones who put them in that position.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    For an individual supporting themselves. For anyone with a family, it’s been a poverty wage for a very long time. Spoiler, more than a third of minimum wage earners have children to support.

    • SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Um? I’m making more than twice that and I can just barely afford rent, food, etc. I’d hesitate to call anything below $15/hr even remotely livable, and that’s out in the sticks.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Poverty wage is not anywhere near a liveable wage. It’s the federal definition for “too poor to survive without assistance.” A living wage is enough to support yourself, a family, and leaves enough to find personal fulfillment. That’s at least two to three times the poverty wage, depending on where you live and how many dependents you have.

        FDR intended for the minimum wage to be a living wage, not a poverty wage. The oligarchs that run America prefer a minimum wage be below a poverty wage, because poor people are easier to exploit.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          it gets darker and more insidious than that. america’s definition of poverty is unique unto ourselves. the rest of the world views poverty as a condition in which a person is unable to do all the human things humans do. poverty wages, everywhere else, is anyone not making a living wage. but we, in our incredible exceptionalism, defined our own definition of poverty, and then refuse to acknowledge that more and more people are slipping into it.

          the key to understanding why we refuse to acknowledge this is because poverty is enforced. it is always enforced. the natural order of nature is for humans to care for eachother. the greedy parasites who control us though need us to be desperate enough to keep us from realizing we provide them with comforts we do not benefit from because we’re just trying to scrape out a basic living from table scraps.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    20 hours ago

    President Felon will change the poverty threshold to $0.15 to prove everyone is doing excellent.

  • veroxii@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    CEOs read “minimum wage” and they think “maximum wage”.

    It’s just a branding issue. /s

      • 3abas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        by these metrics half of Americans are below poverty!

        I mean yeah sure, if we just throw around a random percentage, the metrics are the problem.