You’re the one blindly attacking someone’s statement BECAUSE OF WHO THEY ARE without any critical thinking. The exact thing you’re accusing this other person of doing.
What you have demonstrated is the opposite of critical thinking, but a reactionary dismissal based on the identity, not even considering the actual content of the statement.
You’re the one blindly attacking someone’s statement BECAUSE OF WHO THEY ARE without any critical thinking. The exact thing you’re accusing this other person of doing.
What you have demonstrated is the opposite of critical thinking, but a reactionary dismissal based on the identity, not even considering the actual content of the statement.
You can see your hypocrisy here, right?