• dill@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How does this compare to other countries?

    Edit: piss poor googling lead me to 17% of flights in USA being private.

    • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Private != Jet though, a 172, while still not the most efficient method of travel is much different than a leerjet.

      • ultimitchow@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        For anyone wondering, a 172 can hold 3 adults including the pilot, cruises at 115mph, and burns about 9 gallons of fuel per hour so it gets 12.8 miles per gallon. A Learjet 45 can hold 11 people, cruises at 510mph, and burns about 200 gallons per hour so it gets 2.2 mpg. A Boeing 787-9 can hold 290 people, cruises at 560mph, burns 2000 gph, and gets 0.28mpg.

        The 172 uses 2.63 gallons per person to go 100mi, the Learjet uses 4.06 gallons, and the 787 uses 1.23.

        A 2022 Toyota Corolla gets around 40mpg highway and squeezes 5 people inside so it uses 0.5 gallons per person per 100mi.

        • owf@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          A 2022 Toyota Corolla gets around 40mpg highway and squeezes 5 people inside so it uses 0.5 gallons per person per 100mi.

          5 people in the Corolla is 2–3 times as many people as are at all likely to be in there. That’s a very skewed number.

          When using realistic numbers, cars come in at about the same per mile as large commercial airliners. (Flights tend to be far, far longer of course.)